![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| VRay Render Chaos Group VRay Renderer |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Auckland
Posts: 44
Name: Janusz Choromanski |
Hi Guys,
Doing a render for portfolio, all is done, just need to know if this is normal. Im in the process of renderinf my first 'Final-High Settings' image out of Vray. Here are the settings: Output Resolution: 1920 x 850 Adaptive DMC Vray Lanczos Filter Min SubDivs: 2 Max SubDivs: 20 Clr Thresh: 0.001 Primary: Brute Force @ 16 Subdivisions Secondary: Lightcache @ 1600 Subdivisions w/ Glossy Rays checked Its and interior shot of an open space with glass and glossy wood but is it normal to see a render like this take up to 30 Hours to render????? I have an I7 system with 12Gigs Ram. Its rendering as I write this, but the estimated time is climbing close to 40 hours. PLEASE HELP!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
|
It should climb. What you are doing is trying to sharpen a noisy sampling(brute force) with a clr threshold of .001(to eliminate the noise) with a 2x20 image filter to smoothen it. .001 is very steep
Try 4x16 min max and .01 clrthresh. If you can, post the rest of the parameters, and a sample of the render.
__________________
MD8 Design Solutions X3MFX Interactive Design Agency DE MAX Design PTE LTD |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Auckland
Posts: 44
Name: Janusz Choromanski |
From reading tutorials and so forth, says that Brute Force is more accurate especially when you have blurry, glossy aspects which I have a lot of. But I must say I have tried the Irradiance Map + Lightcache combo and I can deal with the slight noise in the blurry reflections. Got it down to 9 Hours for a 1900 x 850 render. I think the reason why it could be taking so long is because its an interior night shot with heaps of IES lights. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Auckland
Posts: 44
Name: Janusz Choromanski |
Quote:
Cool, but do you think its normal for it to be taking 25+ hours for a 2000 x 900 image to render out. My machine aint slow, hard for me to know because this is my first proper Vray render. Thanks for the advice though, will give it a try. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Age: 37
Posts: 6,881
Name: Stephen Leworthy |
your problem is lack of experience with vray. those AA settings are too funny
IRR+LC (or BF even) will give you exactly what you want in a fraction of the time. just have a play and experiment. dont just throw it into high settings mode and hit render else you'll suffer and end up in here looking for a way out. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Russia
Posts: 11
Name: Artyom Servin |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| VRAYforC4D: GI animation tut-01 | STRAT | 2D/3D Tutorials | 0 | October 25th, 2008 06:03 AM |
| The Five Points of Architecture | garethace | General Discussions | 13 | May 29th, 2008 11:24 PM |
| Canceling the render takes so much time!!! | yushi | VRay Render | 4 | April 13th, 2008 07:37 AM |
| skylight render time | Helen | Autodesk VIZ | 3 | September 22nd, 2003 07:34 AM |
| cinema 4d | PiNkFlUiD | Finished Work | 13 | February 28th, 2003 05:00 AM |