Jump to content

cinebench 2003


STRAT
 Share

Recommended Posts

Date 3/3/03 CINEBENCH 2003 v1

**************************************************

**

 

Tester : Paul Griger

 

Processor : Dual AMD 2000+ MP

MHz : 1.67

Number of CPUs : 2

Ram : 1G

Operating System : Win 2K SP2

 

Graphics Card : Nvidia GeForce 4 Ti4600 bios: 4.25.00.27.32

Resolution :

Color Depth :

 

**************************************************

 

Rendering (Single CPU): 209 CB-CPU

Rendering (Multiple CPU): 389 CB-CPU

 

Multiprocessor Speedup: 1.86

 

Shading (CINEMA 4D) : 214 CB-GFX

Shading (OpenGL Software Lighting) : 897 CB-GFX

Shading (OpenGL Hardware Lighting) : 1272 CB-GFX

 

OpenGL Speedup: 5.94

 

**************************************************

**

 

I await my humiliation from your new system Strat ;)

 

BTW, the CG Talk group posted their tests here:

 

http://www.cgtalk.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=46752&perpage=15&pagenumber=1

 

best,

 

paul

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Strat,

 

Here's my setup:

 

Power Mac G4 Dual 1 GHz ("mirrored drive doors")

768 MB RAM

ATI Radeon 9000 Pro

OS X 10.2.4

 

and my results...

 

C4D shading: 121

OpenGL software shading: 322

OpenGL Hardware shading: 484

OpenGL factor: 4.00

 

Raytrace (single CPU): 96

Raytrace (dual CPU): 174

dual speedup factor: 1.81

 

I just got my copy of C4D about 2 weeks ago, and I'm really liking it. Your radiosity tips have helped too. I'll start posting images in the next couple of weeks for some critiques.

 

Jack

Link to comment
Share on other sites

guys, can we also put the rendering scene time in minutes and seconds too? only the values given i dont understand, they're certainly not in seconds.

 

[edit]

Paul, why not change ur resolution from 1280x1024 over to 1280x960? only this will give you a 1.333 ratio renders come out at.

[edit]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by STRAT:

guys, can we also put the rendering scene time in minutes and seconds too? only the values given i dont understand, they're certainly not in seconds.

I'm not sure what the unit is, but higher = better. :D

 

Maybe it Gigawatts? "1.21 GIGAWATTS!!!"

 

Originally posted by STRAT:

Paul, why not change ur resolution from 1280x1024 over to 1280x960? only this will give you a 1.333 ratio renders come out at.

My LCD screen is optimized at this res. Any other res and I don't get the full bennys of the LCD DVI hook-up. :shrug:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Strat has suggested, this new measurement in Cinebench is a little confusing. I've been using Cinebench for several years on many machines and had developed a very good sense of estimation with it. P3s and P4s were approx Ghz X 10. G3s and G4s were Ghz X 13. The new scale throws everything off. Its a little less than 10 X in raytracing though vs the older versions. This shouldnt be the case since the new engine is 20% fatser. My dual Athlon scores around 36 on the old scale and around 350 on the new scale. Oh well, I guess we just have to get used to the new measurements.

 

Oh yeah, the UPS guy tried to deliver V8 today so I should have it tomorrow :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CINEBENCH 2003 v1

**************************************************

 

Tester : Steve Leworthy

 

Processor : IBM Intelli Station

MHz : 2.66 Xeon

Number of CPUs : 2

Operating System : XP Pro

 

Graphics Card : nvidia quadro4

Resolution : 1280x960

Color Depth : 32 bit

 

**************************************************

 

Rendering (Single CPU): 267 CB-CPU - 1 min 38 secs

Rendering (Multiple CPU): 572 CB-CPU - 46 secs

 

Multiprocessor Speedup: 2.16

 

Shading (CINEMA 4D) : 273 CB-GFX

Shading (OpenGL Software Lighting) : 1167 CB-GFX

Shading (OpenGL Hardware Lighting) : 1210 CB-GFX

 

OpenGL Speedup: 4.44

 

**************************************************

 

[ March 28, 2003, 07:50 AM: Message edited by: STRAT ]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by STRAT:

just click on the 'edit/delete post' button and add the times in.

Ohh, Cinebench can't do this as an option then? It sounds like i'd have to time the results myself then, right?

 

That may be too low on my list right now, but if i get time i'll do that if that's what you mean Strat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

paul - no need to time them urself, just take a note of the render times in the bottom left of the render window. (as per normal in c4d).

 

also, no need to run the complete tests again, you can just run the render option on it's own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

up-grade my polly count? moi? ;)

 

no, the reason i did it was i thought (half way through this post) it would be interesting to make it a general bench test and not just the c4d forums test. i left this c4d topic open then to suit the guys who may want to post here instead.

 

any problems tho, i (or you) can always delete this thread. i dont mind :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...