Jump to content

Xeon E3 1230V3 Hasswell - Impressive with Vray renderer.


Recommended Posts

Hello everyone.

 

Recently, I have some quick test with Xeon E3 1230V3, a Hasswell base CPU with a famous 3D renderer : Vray

I used 2 version of 3dsmax & Vray to do my tests.

  1. Vray 1.5SP5 & 3dsmax 2011
  2. Vray 2.40.03 & 3dsmax 2012

 

The rendering time to finish the render tasks of Xeon E3 1230V3 are really impressive compare to the previous gen CPUs.

 

I did my tests with 2 3dsmax scenes from Evermotion.

(Lightcache/Number of passes is set to 8/12 to match the CPUs core/threads)

 

Archinteriors 01 - vol 01:

9124988593_3063ede2f7_b.jpg

 

Archinteriors 03 vol 16:

9124988121_bd81256309_b.jpg

 

 

My hardwares :

  1. Intel Xeon E3-1230V3 Haswell LGA 1150
  2. Crucial Single 16 chip 8GB ( 2x4GB ) bus 1600
  3. Gigabyte H87M-D3H - LGA 1150
  4. Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB
  5. Sparkle NVIDIA GTX 650
  6. Corsair Builder VS450
  7. Zalman CNPS 5X Performa
  8. THOR Athena Mid-Tower Gaming Case

Edited by Superkames
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The results:

 

All screenshots can be downloaded here : http://www.mediafire.com/download/v67qvbuh52ewqvq/Screenshot.rar

 

 

And the charts:

 

Archinteriors 01 - vol 01::

 

9127206056_d74fb2a714_o.jpg

Rendering time (second): lower is better.

 

Archinteriors 03 vol 16::

 

9124987631_6f999a3bbc_o.jpg

Rendering time (second): lower is better.

 

 

Archinteriors 03 vol 16 - Rendering time (percent) compare with Xeon E3 1230V3:

 

9124988287_b2de0c41fd_o.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did not have seen a similar test before, but beating a Sandybridge EP arch (3820) by 30%, while rated @ 70% or less TDP, is simply amazing.

 

Looks impressive - almost too good to be true:

3820 has an "aggregate" GHz of 8 Threads * 3.6GHz = 28.8 GHz @ Sandy EP

The peppy Xeon has 8 Threads * 3.6GHz = 26.4 GHz @ Haswell

 

To beat the 3820 by 30%, that means the Haswell Xeon is nearly 42% more efficient in VRay over Sandy EP (Sandybridge Xeons).

The rest of the compute benches I've seen place it more in the 15-17% range, which is more believable and consistent, but I would be glad to be surprized.

 

Great presentation at any rate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did not have seen a similar test before, but beating a Sandybridge EP arch (3820) by 30%, while rated @ 70% or less TDP, is simply amazing.

 

Looks impressive - almost too good to be true:

3820 has an "aggregate" GHz of 8 Threads * 3.6GHz = 28.8 GHz @ Sandy EP

The peppy Xeon has 8 Threads * 3.6GHz = 26.4 GHz @ Haswell

 

To beat the 3820 by 30%, that means the Haswell Xeon is nearly 42% more efficient in VRay over Sandy EP (Sandybridge Xeons).

The rest of the compute benches I've seen place it more in the 15-17% range, which is more believable and consistent, but I would be glad to be surprized.

Great presentation at any rate.

 

 

15-17% range is ok if you compare them with Cinebench R11.5 or scanline renderer.

 

Vray is a different story and it is rarely seen in CPUs reviews .

 

Cinema 4D R13 - default renderer is also different from Vray or Cinebench R11.5:

 

Cinema 4D E3 1230V3.jpg

 

Cinema4D E3 1230V2.jpg

 

Cinema4D.jpg

 

Try it yourself if possible and you will see how impressive it is.

Edited by Superkames
Link to comment
Share on other sites

interesting!

But if this is true it looks like it must be something v-ray related (and maybe c4d R13), because the maxwell scores look almost the same as ivy bridge. Maybe they are already using AVX2?

 

btw. the FX8350 looks impressive too here!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...