damienaleksandr

Thank you for participating in the topic! This work was done for myself as one of the test renders of my model of the cathedral, on which I have been working for many years and is not expected to be completed. A small part of the samples can be seen in my portfolio. Apparently the duration of the work will be equal to the period of the history of the construction of the cathedral itself, but only with the difference that the cathedral built and continues to build several generations, and the history of my model will end with me. I do the model differently, as it is customary to do them, because it’s not for sale and therefore I don’t care about the number of polygons and the weight of the model - almost every element of the cathedral is modeled, I don’t drag a texture map onto one simplified unified model. But I am glad that the computer copes with a huge number of polygons and allows you to make a film (animation) in Mental Ray. Angel and Demon appeared for the film. Now I am mastering the render of the Corona and maybe I will try the cathedral in this render. Thank you again for participating in this topic and I wish you creative success!

Thank you!

Translate and understand your reply using online translator does not work (as well as feedback from other participants). I even asked Native Americans to help with the translation of the texts, but they also can not understand what is written about my rendering quality in my topic (I still have more ... I do not). Apparently those who have written some of their own, understandable only to the chosen 3d artists the meaning. But thanks for the links to your videos, they have a lot of interesting!

Thanks to all who participated in this topic! But no one gave an assessment on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5. Online translator often gives an incomprehensible translation of the text (even my text in English has a directly opposite meaning). That's why I asked to be evaluated in numbers. Francisco Penaloza - I wanted to know the general, first impression. Thomas Denis, ************************if I understand the translation correctly, it gives a very bad one, 1. Scott Schroeder - I realized that you are working on the rays emanating from ************************sculptures. Your video is very short, 0.16 seconds. You can ************************Do you show the sculpture and the continuation of the video? Thank you. Francisco Penaloza - I realized that you do not like the work, the bad light in ************************photoshop. Thank you. Eliot B - Thank you, your score 1. Georg Sandoval - Thank you, I'll look at your work. Mine do not have ************************commercial character, do for myself, show my friends and ************************on 3d sites. Thomas Denney - The model of the cathedral is completely mine, highly detailed. ************************From 1000 on to Gothic Kitbash 3d only one detailed, but not ************************so. Over it I have been working for many years, I clarify. On this ************************Stage 3 sculptures from the Internet, but gradually I change them ************************on their own. Thank you, your rating is 1.

That there would be no doubt that my work, I can attach a grid.

Is it possible to include Le Corbusier in the category of architects - dinosaurs?

I want to know the general opinion about this my work - very poor visualization or acceptable, suppose, if we evaluate on a 5-point scale, then 1,2,3 or 5? In general, the assessment is very complicated, especially subjective opinion - how many people, so many opinions and often completely opposite. Therefore, I simplify the task and simply ask for your general impression. That there would be no doubt that my work, I can attach a grid.

Very much I ask to give the detailed estimation of quality of visualization of a scene with my models. The idea, the composition is not necessary to assess, only the technical level - lighting, materials, modeling. Do not be afraid to offend. The insipid of the work was in the format of png and translated into jpg in Photoshop.

Thank you! I have a 3ds max of 2016. I made water jets using the Particles of the program itself (they are visible on the video attached to the topic). Tell me please, does the link to my video open? I'm interested in the track from the windshield wiper on the glass, behind it will appear a transparent area of glass and cloudy where the cleaner does not grab a piece of glass? Unfortunately, I did not find any examples and an answer to this question on the plug-in's website.

Tell me, please, how to make animated tracks from the wipers on the auto glass.

In my practice there was a case when the employer liked my manual work and he asked to do a manual pitch, it was a long time ago, about 1995 year. At this time I worked with pencils and a rapidogram dreamed that for example the sky, for me, a computer - for too long and it was unpleasant to shade it. But at that time computers have not yet entered everyday life, but now the sky on the computer is done in a minute. But in life, if you are given one, then another is selected. I can tell about this in the next post. But to continue, I would like to know an David Turner - architect by profession or as a visualizer com James Vella?

Is it possible to determine the render with the proofs in which the picture is made? (Virey, Lumion, Mental Ray and the program - 3d Max, AutoCad, Lumion and others) And the second question - on what technical, objective parameters determine the quality of the render (visualization)? But if the quality issue has already been considered at the forum, then please give a link to it.

According to your personal data, you are on this site since 2010 and for me it is very unclear why you have not heard about the Avardes that take place every year on this site. It's possible that I misunderstood you, because I read and write in English using an online translator. And if you have not really heard about the annual Avard, then click on the link at the very bottom of the main page of the site and see a huge number of works sent to this competition, all of them interesting and good, nominees are already selected and winners will be announced soon. I asked this question in the hope of learning more about this competition, for example, it's strange to me that the author himself decides to send a job or not, there are other confusing moments. But despite this, I ventured to send my work and she was enrolled to my joy, she will not get an avar, but I was interested in the process of participation.

Many thanks! And thanks to him I got acquainted with your portfolio, with the theme of your work. Therefore, the question - you participated in the Avardes 2015, 16, 17, 18 years. If not, why?