maymoonc

great, thanks for answering

not a good question, just ignore it

Just carious, if you had the time would you take it seriously as a career or just to extend knowledge?

I am aware that it's not make scene to do modeling for assets when you work for client But I was asking generally about the idea of how heavy can archviz get in-depth compare to other fields and are they proficient more You had a good point I guess "it's about business"

so, That’s it I don't know why I think it's kinda similar to the topic "do what you love or love what you do" Anyway I appreciate your quick replay and really great answer Thanks

Hello, when I plan to do personal stuff & practicing I like to make everything myself I even trying to use software's for trees & vegetations.. But most of the artist who work on archviz rely more on premade models "I know no one can make a great images by only use a ready models its way more than that" But I feel archviz society don't care that much about this heavy modeling or getting more in complicated cg stuff "only few archviz artists consider that or the one who make these models for others to use" and when I am try to learn those stuff I follow guys who work in other fields so I have two questions ?? 1- If archviz is what you work on, isn't getting heavy in sculpting & trees for example a waste of time?? 2- Does other field like "game environments" get more indepth in cg stuff & softwares?? Don't know if you discussed this before, correct me if I am wrong

yes you will find a huge difference especially it has 6 cores definitely you need a better power supply & gpu as Zdravko Barisic said If you don’t have more money just replace liquid cooling with air cooling

how much RAM do you need at least to handle a scene like this or less ??

Joel McWilliam not sure what you complaining about anyway I saw this, 780 is a beast for sure but I think 670 was amazing as well "you guys may have a different look" I also thought 670 is slightly better than 760, but you may mean for viewport acceleration there will be no difference thanks

Ok, l am gonna ask again in different way I might end up with millions polygons scenes would 760 & 16 gb ram enough only need viewport acceleration for gpu but I will have heavy scenes this is the last question, please

the only thing I need is viewport acceleration, but I am afraid to end up with millions polygons scenes, will that makes me think of GTX 780 or lower will be enough??

I am surprised, I was planning to put 2X8 then in future add couple more am I gonna fill with 4X4gb ?! when I need more memory they gonna be worthless, am I right??

thanks Thomas Hope thanks Dimitris Tolios I might go with 770 because I am planning to learn Mari

right, thanks i will go with low profile 16 gb 1866 and upgrade if future if i have any troubles but I really still confusing between gtx 760 or 770 !

what about 2400MHz, is there a noticeable different even with 1600