garethace Posted May 15, 2003 Share Posted May 15, 2003 Plan on doing the same for the memory; getting the least amount and not use it. Then get 4*512 elsewhere. I am actually not entirely sure, because the chipset is an old Pentium 3 840 workstation motherboard with two 1GHZ chips (slot types). I know the board of that class can support registered memory or not. Considering the price i paid for the modules, i would say yes, registered. The nice part about the OR840 platform too, was it is dual channel 4 slot memory system. ALtogether as stable a machine, as i have ever built. The Pentium 3s weren't very hot either you see. But i went on towards AMD athlons after that - Intel was just getting far too expensive to buy and upgrade i thought. I used a couple of very nice registered PC 133 SDRAM modules in a KT 133A once - i taught i wouldn't work but it did, the performance increase was actually quite good. I got two 256MB modules when a Dell server was upgraded to 1GB - so i was lucky to get them - i wish i had never given them away though - would do nicely in a rendering farm situation now! You see, i invested heavily in rambus pc 800, and then the specs of memory changed so dramatically, i decided to purchase all value memory ever since - and just replace the dimms regularly, for bigger ones. I find it hard to fills all memory slots with value memory though - i think, that is where higher grade registered/ecc memory does come into the equation. In alot of boards, filling the 4 slots needs registered, but with only two full, you normally do get away with unbuffered. It is alot like Hard drives really, isn't it? I mean for alot of applications adding more integrated cache (8-16mbs) will provide better performance increase than spindle speed/more bandwidth etc. But if your chipset does support say 400mhz DDR sdram with a canterwood chipset say, and a new Prescott P4 chip do you really need registered memory? It would be interesting to benchmark the performance actually. The Athlon MP platform is totally for registered memory as a platform, but then again - the Athlon MP is usually employed now as a good database server platform than a workstation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mistyk Posted May 17, 2003 Share Posted May 17, 2003 Thanks for your reply garethace. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garethace Posted May 19, 2003 Share Posted May 19, 2003 No problem, hope i was of some help! You might find this of interest: Some good benchmarking done here: Memory Timings Analysis http://www.techwarelabs.com/reviews/memory/memory_timings/ [ May 19, 2003, 09:59 AM: Message edited by: garethace ] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now