Hotel Exterior.

[Lhanh29]

Hi Guys !

This project now i'm designing and rendering.I'm having problem with glass material.Please give me some your comment Rendering and Architecture.(If possible)I would like to make this project better.Thank for your help. :)

[ebad]

But what renderer do you use? and software ? is it 3dsMax?

[Yaseck]

The glass is not the problem. The artificial-look-like thing is a great leftside wall. Smooth as LEGO brick.

[Lhanh29]

Hi Guys.

This images i have just finished rendering.And Updated immidiately. I'm working on 3DViz_Vray 1.47.02.Here was my setting.Please comments.

Adaptive QMC :max -3 - Min 1 Threshold :0.005

Antialiasm filter :Catmult rom.

GI standard.

Irradiance map : HSph subdivs :60

Quats-montecarlo GI: Subdivs: 50, Second bounces :20.

Gaustics: Search dist :5, Max photons:60.

Dark Multi :1.3

Light :1

I hope This project will better and better.

[Brian Cassil]

Great composition! What an improvement over the first one posted. Just a couple of minor things I noticed. The sky in the first image looks a little warped just to the right side of the building. Also the red base of the building looks a little too red. Other than that I think its fantastic work... nice and lively.

[arquiteck09]

The second post looks a lot way better, maybe just fix a little the compositing.

[phil]

Agree amasing progress. Still is a weird building, haven't seen anything like that yet .

[Lhanh29]

Agree amasing progress. Still is a weird building, haven't seen anything like that yet .

Thank you very much for your comments.Brian Cassil,Yaseck, ebad, arquiteck09.I will try to work more.Bythe way Phil ! Could you explain more what you mean about "Still is a weird building"? What's problem with this project,Renddering or Architecture design.Help me(if passible).Hope to be learnt from you more. ;)

[Balthus]

Hi, first i would like to greet everyone.

About architecture i can say that it doesn't aestheticaly fit in the ambient,but it have some kind of charm,whitch i can attribute to visualisation.But its individual thing.It looks like some kind of Philip Johnsons post modernism thing.

Model and rendering is good, but perspective is problematic,regarding the front of the picture.

The Man nearest to the building seems that he is accros a lake,not the street.

Try to scale down the crowd in front of the picture.

[phil]

THE RENDERING

I kind of read the rendering as a concept sketch. I feel the rendering support the presentation of the project. It doesn't have to be realistic. There is more sharm in idea then in the real thing. Not meant as an offence.

 

Apart from some small remarks which the other guys pointed out, the image sells nicely. It has somehow a kind commercial feel.

 

ARCHITECTURE

What I meant by it being a weird building refers to the architectural aspect. I'm customed to seeing those typical dutch, slick, minimalistic architecture (Holland, Belgium, ...). I definitly feel there is a difference in cultural background. I find oriental architecture and mid-eastern architecture difficult to understand. I've been thinking about that for some time, seeing people presenting there work coming from all over the world. You see there is somehow a non-definable style aspect. It's not always so generic (as Koolhaas points out).

 

PROPORTIONS

Somehow I feel it has something to do with proportions like the scale of the building :

the ground base is quite high referred to the rest of the building (making it smaller then usual) and the top of the building is quite small to the rest. Same thing goes for combining the floors so it looks like one story.

 

STYLE

On the 'decorum' aspect. It has some eclectical aspects. On the one hand it looks quite postmodern (piramid-like volume on the roof, columns, etc.), on the other hand the ground floor makes me think about those typical stores in the begining of the 20th century (those grand-cafés, first shopping malls,...)

The upper part on the other hand is again very postmodern (I'm thinking about Botta, or maybe Venturi & D.S. Brown).

 

My remarks about the architecture have nothing to do with the quality of your work, it's not that I don't like it. I have difficulty defining a quality about the architecture, which I find difficult to grasp. Maybe it has something to do with the architectural school we went to, the tutors we had, or the building-tradition in our countries.

[Lhanh29]

Thank so much ! Phil

i will try to work more with this project.Yes,All your comments are reasonable.But you know,some time we can not follow our idea.i'm make sure that you and me understand what's problem will happend with designer.Anyway iwas to be learnt from you so much.To me all your comments it does not meant as an offence.you are a straightforward person.i like it. ;)