isurunath_b Posted February 4, 2006 Share Posted February 4, 2006 Hi all, I am currently using a P4 2.8 with 1 gig of ram. I was wondering if anyone could advice me on a dual processor system, AMD or Intel to switch to. I would be working on Stills and photorealistic animations. There are no buggetery constraints. I just need some adivice first. Am based in SriLanka. I would be greatful for any adivice given Thank you isurunath Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vizfx Posted February 4, 2006 Share Posted February 4, 2006 Hi If you have no budget restrains than take a look at: - http://www.artvps.com for pure and renderdrive (some very serious rendering hardware) - http://film.nvidia.com/page/gelato.html (rendering plugin for nvidia quadro) - http://www.3dlabs.com – powerful graphic cards Mihai;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zdravko Barisic Posted February 6, 2006 Share Posted February 6, 2006 the best link for 3D pc is: http://www.spendasmuchasyoucanmoney.com theres no ideal advices about this, really. if yu go with Intel then get some 955/975 board and Intel D820 if yu go with AMD,-> 3800x2 +nForce and ofcourse stick with nVidia, thats all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
animart Posted February 6, 2006 Share Posted February 6, 2006 just know this for dual processor 2 x 2.8 Ghz are slower than 1 x 3.6 Ghz i mean dual procesor are dont twice fast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJLynn Posted February 6, 2006 Share Posted February 6, 2006 just know this for dual processor 2 x 2.8 Ghz are slower than 1 x 3.6 Ghz i mean dual procesor are dont twice fast ... which is not true when you are rendering - with most software, duals render twice as fast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frosty Posted February 6, 2006 Share Posted February 6, 2006 just know this for dual processor 2 x 2.8 Ghz are slower than 1 x 3.6 Ghz i mean dual procesor are dont twice fast AJLynn is right. The speed up of a dual system is dependant on software and task. The overall multi-tasking speedup alone is worth the price in my mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juan Altieri Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 i have a dual opteron 246, and render twices fast than a p3 3.0 GHZ with hypertrading........... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJLynn Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 Anyway. You were asking about dual CPU systems. The single-chip dual-core boxes are probably going to be best for you, they get great price/performance. If you have a large budget look at dual-core Opteron (or even dual-dual for 4 cores) systems. For best value, look at AthlonX2 systems - their numbering scheme is a bit odd but an AthlonX2 3800+ will blow away a Pentium D 2800 easily, and so on, even though the Athlon has 2x2GHz cores and the Pentium has 2x2.8. For vendors, there are a lot out there, but I've never heard anything but love for Boxx. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now