Jump to content

Microstation


walianboy
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I am a new member to this group and wondering if there are any Microstation users out there. I'm really trying to persavere with Microstation as I have lots of experience with it and I know it inside out. I'm just wondering if I should go ahead and make the change to 3d Studio though as it seems so much more widely used.

 

Any help/support/thoughts would be much appreciated.

 

Rich

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends what you want to do with it - Microstation is a good cad program, some would say it's good for rendering but I've yet to see evidence of that. Max is for 3D modeling, animation and rendering but lacks some of the modeling capabilities of Microstation and is useless for 2D drafting. If you like modeling in Microstation but want Max's animation and rendering, you could use both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd agree with the response above....but would go further.

I used Microstation for years....as a 2d CAD program and as a 3d modeller. I since have been using Autocad, 3dStudio, or Form-Z (just autocad for modellling now). However, I wish I could go back to Microstation. It seems to have the best of all those 3d modelling programs.

I'd recommend sticking with Microstation for modelling, and purchasing 3dstudio Viz for rendering. From what I understand, Version 8 of Microstation exports fairly seamlessly to a .dwg format.....which you can File Link into Viz for design development.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you go about assigning materials in 3d studio then? Is it by level or colour of do you just point and click?

 

I just want to know as I will take your suggestion and keep with Microstation for modelling but I want to make sure I am not doubling-up my work when I export into Studio.

 

Attached is a rendering I did last night in Microstation. It's fine with flat surfaces but trying to model things like cloth is a nightmare!

 

Regards

 

Richard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats not bad at all, it seems like you're missing shadows though ??

What rendering engine does microstation use ??

 

When I say it not bad I meant that it is certainly adequate to get your point across, I think people are getting way too hung up on photo-real, which is sort of overkill, noone needs a photo-real rendering to visualize what the space will be...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I have seen some of your posts in the Microstation visions forums. The vase looks familiar.

 

Microstation and max/viz work well together, once you have worked out the best settings of 2004dwg exporting works for you. Some suggestions are, dont do any texturing in microstation. Still use the relevant level/ level colour system in Microstation, these get brought into max. Don't light in MS. Save everything as polyface mesh and be careful of MS surfaces, there is a tendancy to drop down to wireframes.

 

I was using MS to Max until recently, but have since switched to ADT to Max.

 

JHV

Justin Hunt Visualisation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dude,

 

Mstation is the best cad application I've ever used. For 2d and 3d. The modeling tools blow Acad out the water, and mstation is an all-in-one application. Drafting, modeling, and rendering. Particle tracing is cool, but it doesn't compete with the reality that MAX and the third party renderers put out. I struggled with the same question 5 years ago. I now use MAX only. The reasons why I switched: All I wanted to focus on was visualization. I didn't want to draft. Hardly anyone knows Microstation unless you are in the South or maybe the East coat. MAX is the industry standard, when it come to the CG world. MAX will open more 3d doors than Microstation. So it depends what you want to be. A 3d dude, or a cad jokey/3d guy.

 

Vince

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Save everything as polyface mesh and be careful of MS surfaces, there is a tendancy to drop down to wireframes.

 

Sounds like a good idea. One question though - how do you save everything as a polyframe mesh?

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Richard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dude,

 

Mstation is the best cad application I've ever used. For 2d and 3d. The modeling tools blow Acad out the water, and mstation is an all-in-one application.

Vince

 

Are you using 3d MAX for modelling as well now then? have you ditched Microstation completely?

 

Rich

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Richard,

I use MS to model, I'm just happier with it and I'm quick with it. I find it too painful to learn modelling when there is so much to learn with the material and rendering settings etc... Also I get all my design data as DGN. Also I really using Max to get to VRay.

I'm happy with the setup, once you have the export DWG + DWG Link sorted it's a piece of p...

Restriction wise I find MS far easier to navigate complex models. But Max is great and I wish I knew it better.

Richard, I've seen your images on the MS NG, and Vincent, I remember you too ;-)

Richard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like a good idea. One question though - how do you save everything as a polyframe mesh?

 

When you do '> Save As' and select DWG, there's an options box. In there is something called 'Entity Mapping.' and you can choose what MStation converts the DGN element to.

 

I used MicroStation, but switched to Vue 5 Infinite for rendering. Now I'm thinking about 3D Studio but am also interested in how I should be modeling for it. I have authorization to get Max and Maxwell. Then I'd have to get Vue XTream for Max...another $600...but Vue's environments are so much nicer...

 

Just gotta gather the time.

 

I stopped rendering in microstation (unless it's an interior which is rare for us). Best non-organic modeller IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ryan, I don't recommend getting Maxwell as a plug-in. Yes the final images look very good, but the rendering times are really high. Too high for production. IMO Try Vray or Finalrender. They are more suited for fast deadlines, and production.

 

Vince

Link to comment
Share on other sites

noone needs a photo-real rendering to visualize what the space will be...

 

I think that is a bit of a sweeping statement, if clients and the genral public have nothing to do with architecture, i.e. if they are the people eventually buying the product, not every one can visualise without seeing close to the finished result, As much as we all get bored of seeing photo real images, there wouldn't be a market out there if they weren't needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...