Jump to content

The perfect visualization (?)


dimopoulos_d
 Share

Recommended Posts

I see great works from time to time, being exposed to c&c (well intented of course) and i was thinking...

 

Have you ever seen the perfect rendering?

(I'm refering to photorealism of course)

Something that can only make you say "wow" and nothing more?

That gives no room not even for a tiny suggestion?

 

Where I'm getting at, is this question....

Is it really worth trying to divide the pixel (!) when the overall impression of an image is just excelent?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah mahorela! You are right. I had not seen his work before. wow.

Not many pixels left there to divide :) That guy is a detail freak!!

And yes kurt the work you posted is top notch also.

 

My point is that even if I could find something in those images that could get better, I would never dare to mention it. For 2 reasons.

First of all, I'm not there myself yet (quality wise), and second, it would be a shame to critic such great work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been sitting here staring at this thread wondering what it was that bugged me so bad and, after too many years in arch school, I think it's the word "perfect". Really, isn't anything in art, architecure, or design based on relativity... a thing "is what it is" and nothing more. There may be interesting qualities of a work (lighting, comp, texturing, modeling, specific techniques, etc...) but a thing is never really perfect because we all see things differently and carry with us (subconsciously - and other) a whole collage of memory and personal observations/impressions about the world around us.

 

Some would say that it's (it being perfection) when nothing can be either taken away or added in order to heighten the quality or the improve upon the "goodness" of the work which I think gets closer to perfection and the truth about what a work really is. I was in a studio crit the other day when another student said his project was perfect... the prof was an ass to start with but I've never seen anyone (the prof) get so disturbed by the mentioning of the word (perfect) in reference to a work (art, arch, other) and rightly so. Sure there are good examples of quality stuff out there but it's perfection is relative not only upon the intentions of the work itself but of us as individuals...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well said tecton3d, but I was not refering to perfection in that way.

I was talking about perfection in photorealism.

Not being able to tell if the image is a real photo or CG.

so it seems that what you're after is more of a technical perfection... ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...