Bugga_Guy Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 I just got a new dell workstation quad core. However the computer seems to be slower than my old Dual Xeon.... It renders faster, can handle/open scenes that have more geometry. However its seems buggy and slow in terms of navigation.. I have been hearing rumors that with max 32 runs slower on windows 64? Has anyone experience this?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavidR Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 Are you using 32-bit Max9? Max8? If Max9, I guess you're using 32-bit version for compatibility with a 32-bit renderfarm, other peoples' files, etc? If so, 64-bit OS allows you to access up to 4GB of memory for 32-bit software, even if you have 8GB or more (32-bit OS allows 2GB/process). 64-bit isn't faster unless your memory requirements are up there, and testing shows it is often a bit slower, but typically a few % -not really noticeable. Your experience sounds like a combo of graphics card and unmet expectations -you expect a quad-core 64-bit machine to scream, right?, but if you cheaped out on the graphics card, or the driver sucks, the gui part will suck too, even if rendering is way faster. Tell us your specs, Max version, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJLynn Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 Or if you're running Vista... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bugga_Guy Posted February 14, 2007 Author Share Posted February 14, 2007 Thanks for the input. My specs are: Microsoft Windows XP Professional x64 ed ver 2003 sp1 Max 8 sp3 commercial 32x bit Dell Precision PWS690 Quad core @ 1.86GHz with 4.00 of ram NVIDIA QUADRO FX 3500 with 1 100 Primary Drive and 2 Back up drives set in RAID at 400GIGS. Everything just seems slower We now have Priemere Pro 2. and that seems slower than my old 6.5. win 64 seems to hang, difficult to run 2 tasks at one time anymore. Our IT guy and I are really scratching my head on this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jafs00 Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 it is slower, since max 8 is designed for the winxp32 bitOS, the 64bitOS has to emulate de 32bit code. If you're not upgrading to max 9 It's not worth installing a winxp64. I think the same applies to premiere pro, but I could be wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJLynn Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 That is a bit odd. The slowdowns for running 32-bit stuff on 64-bit really aren't that bad, and you've got an FX3500, which ought to be kickass. Do you have the latest driver for that? Also, how fast was the machine you're comparing to? 1.86 is no slouch but it only uses 1 core for the Max interface so it's performing like a P4-3.6 or thereabouts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jucaro Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 I resurrect thee thread!!! anyway, just want to add, that i've also experienced some slowdowns running CS2 XP64. Especially during startup of cs2 and during opening of files. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SandmanNinja Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 I resurrect thee thread!!! anyway, just want to add, that i've also experienced some slowdowns running CS2 XP64. Especially during startup of cs2 and during opening of files. The bigger the OS, the more grunt you'll need to run it. It sounds like you have an awesomely grunty machine. I'd check for service pack updates, driver updates, etc. If at all possible, I'd run Max 9 64-bit version. It's made for 64-bit OSes and everything should scream then. I know there are issues with a 64-bit OS running 32-bit programs. I know microsoft wanted to cut-off backwards compatibility to promote security and plug leaks and hacker holes. No chance of upgrading to Max 9? I'd love to see a set of render times with your current configuration and the same scene under max 9. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jucaro Posted April 20, 2007 Share Posted April 20, 2007 Oh, max 9x64 is great under XP64. Backburner and VRayDR is too. I just wished the 64bit versions of the applications im using to arrive already. OT: CS3 has just been released, too bad it isnt certified for 64bit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJLynn Posted April 20, 2007 Share Posted April 20, 2007 But it is Universal Binary on Mac. BOOYA! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaron-cds Posted April 20, 2007 Share Posted April 20, 2007 I resurrect thee thread!!! anyway, just want to add, that i've also experienced some slowdowns running CS2 XP64. Especially during startup of cs2 and during opening of files. Interesting. A few months ago I swithed my OS from xp 32 bit to xp 64 bit. Right before I installed 64 bit I tested some files. The photoshop file opened and saved much faster with 64 bit. This test was on a machine with 3 gigs of ram. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leonmagnavox Posted March 23, 2008 Share Posted March 23, 2008 guys i have 8 gigs too with (xp64/max64/vray64) the problem i have is; i try to test render evermotion interior scene and the Ram wont go more than 4 gigs all the time. I switch boot.ini with \8GB ; it said available in task manager but max64 just wont take it. It cant be because of the process doesnt require ammount of 8 gig of ram; because I tried to render in 20.000 x 10.000 resolution and still just take less than 4GB Is it possible that RAM speed or Graphic Card affecting this? all I can see is that 8 processor always runs in 100% mode (task manager) how much affecting the speed of ram (fully buffered/ecc) from 533/667/800mhz for rendering purposes (max+vray) my processor is 2x quad xeon 3ghz 1333fsb and the test renders mostly done around 30 minutes in 1200x600 resolution thanks alot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now