Jump to content

Viz5.0???


Brink
 Share

Recommended Posts

I just read this from the Viz4 discussion forum - from somebody that actually works there, I think...

 

"From: Chad Ames - Autodesk

Date: Jun/03/03 - 17:23 (GMT)

Hi Gary,

VizRender was not designed to be a replacement for Viz4. It was designed

to be an easy to use (but very powerful) rendering and animation solution

for arch desktop. A successor to Viz4 is currently under development and

should be available later this year.

Hope that clears things up a bit,

Chad

ADT Development"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, maybe it really is, but this comes from the company that spent two years pretending they were carrying Lightscape forward.
But my question is: what to do next? Should I wait till Viz 5 will (if ever) come, switch to MAX or buy Cinema 4D...? I bought Viz 'couse my primary intention was to own relatively cheap rendering platform and I was told that Lightscape gone...

Hard but true: Autodesk doesn't care about the end users...

rgds,

Wojciech Klepacki

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what to do next?...I bought Viz 'couse my primary intention was to own relatively cheap rendering platform and I was told that Lightscape gone...
Does VIZ work for you now? If so--don't worry about what to do next, use what you have. The only reason to upgrade software is if it will improve your work or workflow. Otherwise it is just corporate welfare.

 

Lightscape is dead, but I use it every day and probably will for another year or so. I see that it is starting to hurt my work with the XP problems, so I must move on. I will buy C4D but put it into service SLOWLY. For now my main rendering app is Lightscape. Autodesk COULD have sold me upgrades to LS equal to what a new licence of VIZ4 would have cost (and I bought LS3.2 directly from them, all profit was theirs) but instead I am not buying ANY of their programs. I will buy from someone else.

 

So don't feel you have to upgrade just for the sake of upgrading.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just curious if Lightscape was running prefect in win2k why switch to XP?
Just fine, no worries, mate.

 

I didn't switch, really, I just bought a new computer. My older computer motherboard maxed at a 1G CPU, and took 768MB but was was only happy with 512. But it runs flawlessly. So I had to decide which OS for the new computer. I decided to give XP a try since I know that Microsoft abandons the 'previous' software, only fixing server-related bugs but not adding function. Like with NT4--no USB support or DirectX 7 or 8. I figured I would be better off a year or two from now trying to upgrade an XP box than one running W2K.

 

I hope to have a more pleasant situation as I add new 'modern' software in XP. But it has not been a friend to poor old Lightscape.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...