Stan Zaslavsky Posted August 24, 2008 Share Posted August 24, 2008 here is one for you comments its a small townhouse in a suburban area that is a little more upmarket so we tried to simulate features like ashlar lines through the paintwork and extra features on the porch i had to bring in the model from Revit - so that too a lot of work cleaning up as i mentioned in another thread look forward to your comments on how we can improve further Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ky Lane Posted August 24, 2008 Share Posted August 24, 2008 Modelling looks solid - composition is a little cramped; can you move out a bit? It looks a little vertically elongated? Go wider. - textures need some detail to them and the lighting needs alot of work, but its a great start! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stan Zaslavsky Posted August 25, 2008 Author Share Posted August 25, 2008 Hey Ky, thanks for the feedback - client wanted this particular view so can't do much there. what are your suggestions re lighting? cheers, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ky Lane Posted August 25, 2008 Share Posted August 25, 2008 Id up the exposure alot. Looks gloomy. What renderer/lighting system are you using? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SandmanNinja Posted August 25, 2008 Share Posted August 25, 2008 Hi mate, I agree with ky. This is a house on a clear day with bright sun and clear skies. If you're using MR, I'd use Shutter speed of 1/125 or 1/250 and f/7 or f/8 Nice looking house - you'll have to give me some pointers on exteriors, mate... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skala67 Posted August 25, 2008 Share Posted August 25, 2008 yes definitely work on your lighting. There are some good exterior lighting MR tutorials online now. Also the siding on the house looks a bit out of scale unless it is a different type of siding than i am thinking of. keep up the good work. cheers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horhe Posted August 25, 2008 Share Posted August 25, 2008 The angle looks odd, between an aerial and eye point of view - it would be easier and less time concuming to make the image eye level - then there would be no need on filling the horinzon line with buildings and vegetation - works especially if your client did not provide you with the situation of the site or the neighbouring surroundings are tedious to model. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ankit4d Posted August 25, 2008 Share Posted August 25, 2008 Roof looks flat, you can add bump to make it more realistic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now