STRAT Posted March 27, 2003 Share Posted March 27, 2003 so, anyone tested it? if you have post up your specs and results here, i'll post mine up in the morning you can down load it here - http://www.maxon.net/index_e.html [ March 27, 2003, 11:29 AM: Message edited by: STRAT ] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Griger Posted March 27, 2003 Share Posted March 27, 2003 Date 3/3/03 CINEBENCH 2003 v1 ************************************************** ** Tester : Paul Griger Processor : Dual AMD 2000+ MP MHz : 1.67 Number of CPUs : 2 Ram : 1G Operating System : Win 2K SP2 Graphics Card : Nvidia GeForce 4 Ti4600 bios: 4.25.00.27.32 Resolution : Color Depth : ************************************************** Rendering (Single CPU): 209 CB-CPU Rendering (Multiple CPU): 389 CB-CPU Multiprocessor Speedup: 1.86 Shading (CINEMA 4D) : 214 CB-GFX Shading (OpenGL Software Lighting) : 897 CB-GFX Shading (OpenGL Hardware Lighting) : 1272 CB-GFX OpenGL Speedup: 5.94 ************************************************** ** I await my humiliation from your new system Strat BTW, the CG Talk group posted their tests here: http://www.cgtalk.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=46752&perpage=15&pagenumber=1 best, paul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackb602 Posted March 27, 2003 Share Posted March 27, 2003 Hi Strat, Here's my setup: Power Mac G4 Dual 1 GHz ("mirrored drive doors") 768 MB RAM ATI Radeon 9000 Pro OS X 10.2.4 and my results... C4D shading: 121 OpenGL software shading: 322 OpenGL Hardware shading: 484 OpenGL factor: 4.00 Raytrace (single CPU): 96 Raytrace (dual CPU): 174 dual speedup factor: 1.81 I just got my copy of C4D about 2 weeks ago, and I'm really liking it. Your radiosity tips have helped too. I'll start posting images in the next couple of weeks for some critiques. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STRAT Posted March 27, 2003 Author Share Posted March 27, 2003 guys, can we also put the rendering scene time in minutes and seconds too? only the values given i dont understand, they're certainly not in seconds. [edit] Paul, why not change ur resolution from 1280x1024 over to 1280x960? only this will give you a 1.333 ratio renders come out at. [edit] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Griger Posted March 27, 2003 Share Posted March 27, 2003 Originally posted by STRAT: guys, can we also put the rendering scene time in minutes and seconds too? only the values given i dont understand, they're certainly not in seconds.I'm not sure what the unit is, but higher = better. Maybe it Gigawatts? "1.21 GIGAWATTS!!!" Originally posted by STRAT: Paul, why not change ur resolution from 1280x1024 over to 1280x960? only this will give you a 1.333 ratio renders come out at. My LCD screen is optimized at this res. Any other res and I don't get the full bennys of the LCD DVI hook-up. :shrug: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frosty Posted March 27, 2003 Share Posted March 27, 2003 As Strat has suggested, this new measurement in Cinebench is a little confusing. I've been using Cinebench for several years on many machines and had developed a very good sense of estimation with it. P3s and P4s were approx Ghz X 10. G3s and G4s were Ghz X 13. The new scale throws everything off. Its a little less than 10 X in raytracing though vs the older versions. This shouldnt be the case since the new engine is 20% fatser. My dual Athlon scores around 36 on the old scale and around 350 on the new scale. Oh well, I guess we just have to get used to the new measurements. Oh yeah, the UPS guy tried to deliver V8 today so I should have it tomorrow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STRAT Posted March 28, 2003 Author Share Posted March 28, 2003 CINEBENCH 2003 v1 ************************************************** Tester : Steve Leworthy Processor : IBM Intelli Station MHz : 2.66 Xeon Number of CPUs : 2 Operating System : XP Pro Graphics Card : nvidia quadro4 Resolution : 1280x960 Color Depth : 32 bit ************************************************** Rendering (Single CPU): 267 CB-CPU - 1 min 38 secs Rendering (Multiple CPU): 572 CB-CPU - 46 secs Multiprocessor Speedup: 2.16 Shading (CINEMA 4D) : 273 CB-GFX Shading (OpenGL Software Lighting) : 1167 CB-GFX Shading (OpenGL Hardware Lighting) : 1210 CB-GFX OpenGL Speedup: 4.44 ************************************************** [ March 28, 2003, 07:50 AM: Message edited by: STRAT ] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STRAT Posted March 29, 2003 Author Share Posted March 29, 2003 common guys, any more for any more? you dont have to own cinema 4d to run the tests btw paul and jack, is it possible you can edit in those render times in mins and secs too please to make life easier? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Griger Posted March 29, 2003 Share Posted March 29, 2003 Originally posted by STRAT: btw paul and jack, is it possible you can edit in those render times in mins and secs too please to make life easier? Sure, how does one go about doing that though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STRAT Posted March 30, 2003 Author Share Posted March 30, 2003 just click on the 'edit/delete post' button and add the times in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Miranda Posted March 30, 2003 Share Posted March 30, 2003 Hi folks, Interesting thread. I´m impressed by Strat´s machine results. The Xeons scale extremely well from 1 to 2 cpus. I will post my machine´s results very soon(single athlon). Cheers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Griger Posted March 31, 2003 Share Posted March 31, 2003 Originally posted by STRAT: just click on the 'edit/delete post' button and add the times in. Ohh, Cinebench can't do this as an option then? It sounds like i'd have to time the results myself then, right? That may be too low on my list right now, but if i get time i'll do that if that's what you mean Strat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STRAT Posted March 31, 2003 Author Share Posted March 31, 2003 paul - no need to time them urself, just take a note of the render times in the bottom left of the render window. (as per normal in c4d). also, no need to run the complete tests again, you can just run the render option on it's own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quizzy Posted March 31, 2003 Share Posted March 31, 2003 Why did you make two identical topics? One is here the other one is in the general discussions... (upgrading your post-count?? :winkgrin: ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STRAT Posted March 31, 2003 Author Share Posted March 31, 2003 up-grade my polly count? moi? no, the reason i did it was i thought (half way through this post) it would be interesting to make it a general bench test and not just the c4d forums test. i left this c4d topic open then to suit the guys who may want to post here instead. any problems tho, i (or you) can always delete this thread. i dont mind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quizzy Posted March 31, 2003 Share Posted March 31, 2003 well lets do it like this: ****************** TOPIC CLOSED ****************** Go here for the original post: http://www.cgarchitect.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=000350 now you close this topic STRAT! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now