kenpimentel Posted March 23, 2010 Share Posted March 23, 2010 Here are some details around Quicksilver. http://area.autodesk.com/blogs/ken/quicksilver_details_revealed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter M. Gruhn Posted March 24, 2010 Share Posted March 24, 2010 Hey, thank, Ken. Just last night I was wondering about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wasteland giant Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 As a mental ray user myself, the render times are impressive. I wonder what the final quality vs MR will be in the end. ta, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenpimentel Posted March 26, 2010 Author Share Posted March 26, 2010 mr will be generally better and more predictable. Qs will be very fast in certain cases. My guess is that if you're doing stills, you might stick with mr. If you're doing animations, you might want to see if you can accelerate using Qs for cases where your requirements are not that high. Generally, I doubt you'll use it for final production, but will use it for fast drafts to work out various issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Onzki Posted June 4, 2010 Share Posted June 4, 2010 Is Quicksilver useful for quick preview rendering and MR for final? That's the approach I plan to take should I have this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now