nisus Posted November 29, 2002 Share Posted November 29, 2002 Hi all, Delfoz's post - a great lesson to many - in the challenge section inspired me to set up this new thread. Check out Delfoz tips at: http://www.cgarchitect.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=33&t=000014#000010 Feel free to add any tips or questions. rgds nisus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuno Posted November 29, 2002 Share Posted November 29, 2002 what about 'vertex colors' too? i just did this test today, but i am not very confortable with max.....so can anyone give some tips about 'vertex colors'? best to all, nuno Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nisus Posted November 29, 2002 Author Share Posted November 29, 2002 Hi all, For exteriors I still prefer a light dome (101 spotlights SM with a very low map size) and an additional lower light ring (21 spotlights without shadowcasting with very low map size) to light up the bottom faces. Next I add a sunlight with a high contrast setting. For interiors I mirror the sunlight (shadow) over all wall directions (axis) and dimm the bounced sunlight spots (no shadow cast). Than I add attunuated omni's at the place of a lightfixture and additional ones on the large surfaces to simulate bounce-lights. rgds nisus SM: shadow map Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ingo Posted November 30, 2002 Share Posted November 30, 2002 Hi all, just curious, why dont you use raydiosity ? Its faster to set up and mostly faster than render a skydome with more than 100 lights with SM (i mean SM for shadow mapped, not what you think ). And with the skydome lights or backdrop raydiosity you miss the additional lightbounces of raydiosity that make thinks look better, especially in architecture. Since raydiosity is available why dont you use it. In a few years you are forced to use raydiosity, so why not invest your time in learning raydiosity instead of using old fashioned methods ???? Just my two cents ingo thinking different, eh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DelfoZ Posted November 30, 2002 Share Posted November 30, 2002 Not all peoles have Viz 4 or Max 5, and the Max 4 and viz 3 or less dont have $$$$ to buy a brazil, final render , lightscape, Vray etc, etc, And always is good to know a Old methods, Is like hand-draws, u need know a traditional methods to know the new motods (PC). In the past i use Final render for exterior, now i like more the Fakradiosity, more easy, and same result, ( no bounces/bleed of curse ) But nice images and more quikly renders for Videos, Interior images i prefer Radiosity, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ingo Posted November 30, 2002 Share Posted November 30, 2002 >> Not all peoles have Viz 4 or Max 5, and the Max 4 and viz 3 or less dont have $$$$ to buy a brazil, final render , lightscape, Vray etc, etc, Well, i dont have one of Autocads addon renderers, simply to expensive and not useable for detailled work, not to forget the limited im- and export possibilities. But youre right, knowing the old methods is good before you start with the new. ingo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ingo Posted November 30, 2002 Share Posted November 30, 2002 Ok, here's by old lightrigg from the before-raydiosity age. As you see these are 3 x 6 lightrings with SM-spots (i love these abreviations), and an additional distance/parallel bottomlight without any shadows. regards ingo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DelfoZ Posted November 30, 2002 Share Posted November 30, 2002 and the result ? post the render too And u right Fakeradiosity r a old technique, and u need experience to use radiosity. Maybe if u r new in 3d, Fakeradiosity r a exlenet tool. or used in school, if the school only have Max4 or Max5 ( not too much time to learn all Max Stuffs in 6 months 3 hours per week) or in a small office with low resources . etc etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuno Posted November 30, 2002 Share Posted November 30, 2002 anyone who can help on 'vertex color' too? nuno Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ingo Posted November 30, 2002 Share Posted November 30, 2002 Hi Nuno, well from my short experience you need to subdivide the polygones into smaller ones too much to get the desired result. But vertex maps are good for making dirt maps or something where you want to blend one texture into another. I think its easier to paint your raydiosity onto UV maps for the luminosity or diffuse channel. Anyone experience with the good old gMIL fake-raydiosity shader ? ingo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STRAT Posted December 2, 2002 Share Posted December 2, 2002 http://www.the3dstudio.com/tutorials.asp?id=97 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevp Posted May 5, 2003 Share Posted May 5, 2003 Here's two tutorials on faking GI i found useful, one is for an interior one is for an exterior: http://www.michaelscholz.de/neuehomepage/tutorial/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T' Posted September 25, 2003 Share Posted September 25, 2003 hi all, first of all, i think radiosity is a fantastic invention, render with absolute accuracy, but it is good only if you have a really 'powerful' pc. Try radiosity on your p4 3G, 1G DDR RAM, Gforce FX, it is still going to take long to finish one good render, it is meant for render farm to be honest. so, fake radiosity - set up a dome of lights - is still the fastest method to fake it! trust me that's why we are still using it for exterior rendering Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kid Posted September 27, 2003 Share Posted September 27, 2003 ...but it is good only if you have a really 'powerful' pc...not entirely true. Radiance runs well on pretty much anything. ...probably even on STRAT's laptop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now