Jump to content

2004 Architectural Visualization Survey


JHalton
 Share

Recommended Posts

Yeah once I am done the presentation in Copenhagen I will release most of the results. I am being told that I should sell the results to vendors though. My thoughts are that this particular survey are not scientific enough to warrant a company paying for them and making a business decision based upon them. However, I may try to do more scientific ones in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My thoughts are that this particular survey are not scientific enough to warrant a company paying for them and making a business decision based upon them.

Well, whatever biases inherent in the responding class are fairly obvious. As long as those are spelled out, I don't see much problem with your results, so long as you get a good enough response sample. What would make a survey 'more scientific'?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What would make a survey 'more scientific'?

Lots! I've been told by a person who's father does polling for a living that the questions lead the user too much. There are a lot of other tricks I guess to ensuring that you get the proper results form the survey. There is no doubt that there will be usefull information come from this survey, but it could be better. Next time.:)

 

I've had 445 people take the survey so far so there is a very good sample range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

you and someone else, looking at the surveys responses...heres a response to the last question about "Do you wanna add something else?"

 

RESPONSE Nº 69 :

 

"....DID I WIN? Can i enter again under a differnt name with differnt opinions to increase my chances? Oh darn! "

 

 

Or that was you?...... :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Were the prizes distributed fairly or just to friends?

 

Well, I was not contacted, so I guess I'm neither a winner nor a friend. So sad... Oh, well. I forgot all about 'prizes' anyway. It is a good survey, but needs fewer 'write-ins' as it is too hard to digest all the various comments. Some are harder to digest than others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Eric,

 

I know you're new here, but I'm sure there are at least several dozen people on these forums alone that will attest to my integrity. The prizes were awarded! Vendors shipped directly to the winners and they were selelected by survey number and a random number generator. I did not post the winners as I was too busy getting ready for 3DFestival. Not that I don't have anything better to do, but to put yours and any other sceptics thoughts to rest, here is the list of winners.

 

Absolute Textures - Michael Starr

Absolute Textures - M Mounce

ArchVision - Martin Gatrost

Bionatics - Michael Tutaj

Cadai - Brett W Freese

Cadai - Alexei Dranicer

Cadai - Önder Bayraktar

CGtoolbox - Arthur C. Tanudarta

DigArts - Phonexay Soumpholphakdy

DigArts - Daniel Fritschi

DigArts - Linda Mounsey

Digital Elements - Michael Berg

Eovia - Holli Alvarado

Eovia - Zack Strowd

Got3D - Chandrashekhar Hampiholi

Hyperfocal - Mariusz Pyrak

Sketchup - Andrew McDonald

Lowpolygon3d - Travis Lewis

Realworld Imagery - Michael S. Przybyla

TurboSquid - Roberto Corradini

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a good survey, but needs fewer 'write-ins' as it is too hard to digest all the various comments. Some are harder to digest than others.

I did'nt win either, maybe I'll just take my toys and go home :p .

 

 

The write-ins were the best part. How often are we fed disseminated poll / survey results without understanding the true cross section of respondants. After about 15 minutes, of browsing the survey, the general attitudes and view points become rather obvious, imho. The comments add validity to the survey in many cases and some the survey actually helps to invalidate fears/trends expressed as views. Unlike our political pollsters & vocal minority, taking the views, beating the perverbial drum about a small segment's negative views and disregarding the minimal impact based on reality of the statistics.

 

But I prefer understanding over percieved fact. It takes extra digestion but whats life with out a little heartburn? Less purple ;) ?

 

WDA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, that wasn't so hard was it? :) I wish I would of gotten this answer several weeks ago when I first asked instead of dragging it through mud to get a response.

 

Cheers,

 

Eric

I was in Copenhagen and then in London on business, and had very little time to answer questions on the forum, or even update the site for that matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...