johncassel Posted May 20, 2004 Share Posted May 20, 2004 I am convinced by these results to buy a new dual xeon machine. Now I need to know where to buy such a machine. I've looked at the Dell dual xeons but I'd like to know what other options are avalible. Any recomendations would be appreceated. Thanks, John Maui, Hawaii Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazy Homeless Guy Posted May 20, 2004 Share Posted May 20, 2004 I am convinced by these results to buy a new dual xeon machine. Now I need to know where to buy such a machine. I've looked at the Dell dual xeons but I'd like to know what other options are avalible. Any recomendations would be appreceated. Thanks, John Maui, Hawaii i use an IBM Intellistation, and i have been happy with it. maybe look at Alienware? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pixelperfectg Posted May 20, 2004 Share Posted May 20, 2004 "I am convinced by these results to buy a new dual xeon machine. Now I need to know where to buy such a machine. I've looked at the Dell dual xeons but I'd like to know what other options are avalible. Any recomendations would be appreceated." I am happy with my dual Xeon system from BOXX. Jeff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robing Posted May 20, 2004 Share Posted May 20, 2004 Hi, on my dual Xeon 3.06 (512cache) hyperthreading enabled. + 4Go ddr + Max 6 1.28 min >>>> 88 sec not so bad!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Knourek Posted May 20, 2004 Share Posted May 20, 2004 If you Don't want to build your own then one of your best options would be a workstation from http://www.boxxtech.com -dave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kris Posted May 21, 2004 Author Share Posted May 21, 2004 I finally got my dual Athlon 2800+ 1GB RAM, two of them. Thanks guys, you helped me a lot with your resoults and I think this is ultimate price/speed machine for me. It is so cheep and resoult for this test was ( 93 sec. ). dual Athlon MP 2800+, 1GB RAM ( 93 sec. ) The price for proc. MP 2800+ is 250 $, and motherboard is 300$ so it is 800$ for moth. + two proc. Compare that to prices of Xeon and you'll see the diference. Maybe we can repeat this test with graphic cards for professional 3d app. Anyone knows some good benchmarks program? http://www.VisualizationStudio.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtutaj Posted May 30, 2004 Share Posted May 30, 2004 I am testing an AMD 64 3000 this next week, I will post what I get for times. Kris, hopefully you can add this to the list. Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quizzy Posted May 30, 2004 Share Posted May 30, 2004 P4 3,06Ghz with HT enabled on a 533Mhz FSB 2Gb RAM 144 seconds.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Hess Posted May 30, 2004 Share Posted May 30, 2004 Part of the reason the 3dluvr max benchmarks is stagnated, is because they've become generally useless. Max's renderer is highly flawed. Its generally a large pos. (Thats why people see massive reductions in time by swapping to vray, with the SAME SCENE). Keeping that in mind, the best way to test and compare max's standard renderers, is with a scene that takes roughly 5-10 minutes to render, @ 2048x1536, with a high polygon count, and hopefully some reflection/refraction, and area shadows. Self illumination is nice too. Remember that the viewport dragon scene is based on viewport interactivity with a game engine....low poly, tiny textures...its not really a system stresser by any means. Only when the entire system is stressed, while you start to see substaintal differences in performance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
isagreg Posted May 31, 2004 Share Posted May 31, 2004 dual Xeon 3.06 (512cache) hyperthreading enabled Asus PC-DL Deluxe 2Gb ddr Max 5.1 SP1 XP Pro 77 sec. It's very strange! It's faster than dual Xeon 3.2 with 1Mb cache... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kris Posted May 31, 2004 Author Share Posted May 31, 2004 I was thinking about making this benchmark test for Vray becouse I am using it, but there is MentalRay, Finalrender, Brazil.. and many other. Who ever uses 3dsMax, he has scanline renderer. If somebody wants to make Vray or any other renderer test I will send my resoults. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zdravko Barisic Posted June 17, 2004 Share Posted June 17, 2004 1.--- dual Xeon 2.0 Ghz, 1 GB RAM ___________( 118 sec. ) 2.--- dual AMD MP 1800+, 1 GB RAM__________( 138 sec. ) 3.--- Pentium(Northwood) 2.8 Ghz, 1 GB RAM___( 160 sec.) 4.--- single P4 3.0 Ghz, 1 GB RAM____________ ( 169 sec. ) 5.----single PIII 1.13@1.46, 512 SDRAM________( 395 sec ) i815EPT, FSB 166/166 kolko para toliko i muzike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lester_Masterson Posted June 18, 2004 Share Posted June 18, 2004 Dual 2.4 Xeon ~ Asus PCDL ~ 2Gb Ram ~ Fx1000 = 106 seconds I must have done something wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archkre Posted June 18, 2004 Share Posted June 18, 2004 Stupid question:How do I do in WinXp pro to find out how many Ghz does my AMD processor have? My Computer/rightclick/properties: it only says Amd...., but no Ghz! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-Mike Posted June 18, 2004 Share Posted June 18, 2004 Dual xeon 3.06 HT 2Gb DDR, Quadro fx 1100, 30.6 seconds Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kris Posted June 20, 2004 Author Share Posted June 20, 2004 Its hard for me to belive this last resoult from K-Mike Dual xeon 3.06 HT 2Gb DDR, Quadro fx 1100, 30.6 seconds Try to render it by default settings in resolution 1280/960 and youll have more precise resoult. http://www.VisualizationStudio.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-Mike Posted June 21, 2004 Share Posted June 21, 2004 Kris, u're right... i made a great mistake i was replying to another thread, about a vray test-scene.... Sorry for that, please do not consider the above results Bye bye Mike Kaplan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pailhead Posted July 2, 2004 Share Posted July 2, 2004 huh, p4 2.8 800fsb 1mb cache, asus p4c800 875 something... 2gb transcend ddr and 187 seconds ?! something is wrong, and this is a new machine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael-k Posted July 3, 2004 Share Posted July 3, 2004 257 sec. Spec. Laptop Pentium 2.8 Ghz 512 mb ram Radeon 9000 I think im not sure. Win Xp home 3dsmax 5.1 Thats slow, so never use a laptop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hazdaz Posted July 5, 2004 Share Posted July 5, 2004 Nice thread... always good to see what different PCs are ACTUALLY producing for render numbers (even if it is not a very scientific test)... I was shocked that my 1800XP with 786Mb of RAM and a QuadroFX1000 (which has nothing to do with rendering) took a whopping 281 seconds to render all 12 passes of frame 1 in MAX6. I know someone else here posted MAX5 versus MAX6 numbers, and 6 took longer, so I dusted off MAX5, and tried it there and while the time was still slow, it was alot faster than 6; underMAX5 it took 231 seconds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pumuckle Posted July 16, 2004 Share Posted July 16, 2004 my computer has: p4 3.06ghz, 1gig of ram and max5 time was: 182 sec Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pailhead Posted July 20, 2004 Share Posted July 20, 2004 does anyone know why am i 27second slower than a northwood with half as ram? thats 85% (( And where can that vray benchmark be found? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zdravko Barisic Posted August 20, 2004 Share Posted August 20, 2004 1.--- dual Xeon 2.0 Ghz, 1 GB RAM ___________( 118 sec. ) 2.--- dual AMD MP 1800+, 1 GB RAM__________( 138 sec. ) 3.--- Pentium(Northwood) 2.8 Ghz, 1 GB RAM___( 160 sec.) 4.--- single P4 3.0 Ghz, 1 GB RAM____________ ( 169 sec. ) 5.----PIII 1.13@1.42,512SDRAM_______________(400 sec) 6.----P4 2.4@3.0, 1GB DDR___________________(155 sec) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now