Jump to content

After Effects vs. Photoshop


jinsley
 Share

Recommended Posts

I am actually looking to work Composite into the first part of my workflow when doing animation, and possible stills, and then moving to AE or Photoshop.

 

Composite looks to be superior at compositing compared to AE, which is not really a compositor, but can do compositing. I have no idea how it might handle drawn paths and things along those lines, but as far as standard compositing it looks to be better. And it is node based which is preferred when compositing.

 

....but this is just based on an AU class I attended.

http://au.autodesk.com/?nd=class&session_id=7206

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know what you mean. I have had Combustion on any given production machine since roughly 2004, but yet every time I tried to dive into it and learn it I would just get frustrated, and revert back to AE.

 

The good thing about AE is that if you know PS you can probably learn the fundamentals of AE in 4 hours. Things like layer transfer modes, filters, etc.. are similar. It is just knowing the ins and outs.

 

I would say spend the 4 hours to get used to the layout and interface, and then work with a very simple short animation to start practicing actual production work in it. That would probably be enough to get you through your first project.

 

You don't actually need to know how to use everything, you can always just learn the thing you want to do just before you do it. That is typically what I have done with AE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...