zhopudey Posted March 16, 2011 Share Posted March 16, 2011 The architects at the firm where I work have an unusual obsession for 2 point perspective. To add to that, they insist on moving the camera in close and taking a wide focal length - which according to them makes the view more dynamic But then, most the 3d views I've seen online all are in 2-point; which IMO makes it instantly recognizable as 3d work and not a photo. Because all the architectural photos I've seen are in 3-point. Haven't actually seen any photos using tilt-shift lenses. So, do you get to use 3-point, or is it mostly just 2-point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
free agent Posted March 16, 2011 Share Posted March 16, 2011 i dont think youve seen alot of architectural photography because you usually only see 2 point when ur looking at photos of buildings, heres some architectural photography http://www.contemporist.com/ you'll have a hard time finding any photographs in 3 point perspective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zhopudey Posted March 16, 2011 Author Share Posted March 16, 2011 Thanks for the link. Will check that site... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noise Posted March 19, 2011 Share Posted March 19, 2011 We usually stick to 2 point but sometimes there is a noticeable distortion when the lens is particularly wide so a minor adjustment to three point makes it look less distorted. Sometimes the verticals can look like they are bending out but in actual fact they are perfectly straight - this is due to an optical illusion within the image. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now