neil poppleton Posted July 28, 2004 Share Posted July 28, 2004 i have just come acroos this piece of work and can not work out if 3d image or photograph ? i will continue to investigate and hopefully let you know soon... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
salf Posted July 28, 2004 Share Posted July 28, 2004 ??? Its 3d, Ive seen more photorealistic stuff out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kicks Posted July 28, 2004 Share Posted July 28, 2004 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STRAT Posted July 28, 2004 Share Posted July 28, 2004 looks absolutely 3d to me. if not then it's a 'well used' or compressed/processed photo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fran Posted July 28, 2004 Share Posted July 28, 2004 Where did you find this image? I think it would be really funny if it were proved to be a photograph. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neil poppleton Posted July 28, 2004 Author Share Posted July 28, 2004 i have to put you all out of your misery and let you know this image is a professionally taken photograph of a recently completed building, it did shock me a little when i first viewed and thought it would generate interesting comments ! to prove i attach an external shot of building Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fran Posted July 28, 2004 Share Posted July 28, 2004 Yes, I'm finding it very amusing. Thanks for the laugh, I needed it today! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Posted July 28, 2004 Share Posted July 28, 2004 I would have said definite 3D, but I had to question its reality when I noticed the dark corners from a cheap wide angle lense. And there is a smudge or something just to the bottom left of the artwork, and another seen on the bottom left tile down at the bottom of the image. Minor imperfections not normally thrown into a typical rendering. Cool space though! Love the chairs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazy Homeless Guy Posted July 28, 2004 Share Posted July 28, 2004 nah. i still say it is 3d. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando Lino Posted July 28, 2004 Share Posted July 28, 2004 it isn't a good CG image or It isn't a good photo....in both ways it doesn't look well done! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fran Posted July 28, 2004 Share Posted July 28, 2004 it isn't a good CG image or It isn't a good photo....in both ways it doesn't look well done! If you are speaking of the first image, I disagree. I think it is a very nice design and photo, but that's a matter of personal opinion. A higher res with better jpeg compression would be nice. I think ACDSee does a terrific job of converting to jpeg. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sawyer Posted July 28, 2004 Share Posted July 28, 2004 it isn't a good CG image or It isn't a good photo....in both ways it doesn't look well done! Really? Is there something specific about it that doesn't seem well done? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando Lino Posted July 28, 2004 Share Posted July 28, 2004 I am talking about the images....if this is a photo why looks like CG image...and if this is a CG rendering doesn't look too photorealistic to say it is a photo. About the second image...Maybe I am wrong but the shadows are anot right...maybe it is the camera Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricardo Eloy Posted July 28, 2004 Share Posted July 28, 2004 This is really an interesting topic... I gues we're all so used to CG that sometimes we forget how life really looks like. Weird... Anyway, imo the confusion comes from the clean look of the picture. I'm taking it's correct, since it's a new building, but still it looks really clean, CG-ish, if you like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STRAT Posted July 28, 2004 Share Posted July 28, 2004 hehe, i've done this before on another forum - posted up a photo and had a billion damming crits saying how fake the cg was. some phots obviously lend themselves better to cgi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chad Warner Posted July 28, 2004 Share Posted July 28, 2004 Someone will just have to take a photo in a few months and then we'll see if there is any discussion about it being cg or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fran Posted July 28, 2004 Share Posted July 28, 2004 I wonder how often you see scuff marks on the walls and dust bunnies on the floor in the pages of Architectural Digest? In regard to interior architectural viz, I don't see much place for dirt and smudges or cracks in new construction. If it occured in a photograph, I'll bet a dollar that the client would ask to have it air-brushed out. Kind of like a zit on a supermodel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STRAT Posted July 28, 2004 Share Posted July 28, 2004 hehe, whats a dust bunny Fran? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iain Denby Posted July 28, 2004 Share Posted July 28, 2004 Just come to this thread late. I don't want to sound smug, but I thought it was a photo, before I read the answer. Oh yes I did! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STRAT Posted July 28, 2004 Share Posted July 28, 2004 /me rubs chin in most sarcastic manner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fran Posted July 28, 2004 Share Posted July 28, 2004 hehe, whats a dust bunny Fran? It's the reason I'm afraid to look under my bed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard McCarthy Posted July 29, 2004 Share Posted July 29, 2004 It's the reason I'm afraid to look under my bed. PEEKABOOO! . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fran Posted July 29, 2004 Share Posted July 29, 2004 PEEKABOOO!. With your avatar, I feel like I'm in Steven King's "It". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kstruve Posted July 30, 2004 Share Posted July 30, 2004 I was inclined to think it was cg mostly due to the fact that both the interior and exterior view are perfectly exposed. If it is a photograph, then it is a composite of two photos: one exposed for the interior and one exposed for the exterior. It's impossible to achieve this image with one (un-manipulated) exposure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kid Posted July 31, 2004 Share Posted July 31, 2004 3d or real? i just can't decide... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now