Complex retopology, when and how

[Jonathan]

Im creating some really complex meshes from photogrametric point cloud data and have reached a bit of a crossroads in terms of modelling strategy. Should all models be retopologised? What happens when the model is so organic and that level of detailed form is to be maintained? I realise that low poly models are far more useable yet should every nook and cranny be re-modelled (via graphite modelling tools) again? I'd be interested to hear your thoughts.

[Sketchrender]

I know this not the answer you want but is there another way of describing your delima ...image may be?

 

Phil

[Jonathan]

For example, Im testing the Agisoft Photoscan software and have a model of a local standing[ATTACH=CONFIG]42886[/ATTACH] stone. To be of value, something like this needs to be detailed and precise. Attatched is a quick render in Mental Ray with default lighting...

[Sketchrender]

Sounds like a mudbox job, have you thought about it for the this type of work, seems to be made for it.

http://www.3dtotal.com/tutorial/mudbox/12_retopologised_meshes/retopologised_meshes_01.php

 

Might be of help.

[Bruce Hart]

Have you played with Pro Optimize much?

[Jonathan]

Mudbox looks useful but Im not sure its quite right for this type of work. MeshLab is great yet I dont think it creates quads and WrapIt (a max plugin) seems very capable yet Max's topology and graphite tools look of similar quality. Perhaps I should just get my head into graphite? Checked out Pro Optimize but couldnt find anything related.