kianoosh Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 (edited) Hi everyone , I need your help to known ‘How’s your VGA card performamce with 3dsmax 2012 viewport’ to comparison gtx , quadro , Hd radeon and ati firepro . I have a file to test here ( 14.980.000 Polys ) : http://www.up.98ia.com/images/oxccj2jwznpfvegwx5qu.rar +Unzip + Open the file with max 2012 +Press ‘C’ to turn to camera 01. + hit play to get the highest Fps +Turn to shaded , realistic , Wireframe , shaded + Wireframe . My PC : -cpu : 2600k no OC -vga : 9600 gt 1gb -ram :2*4gb DDR3 1600hz g.skill ripjaws -mb: asus maximus iv extreme p67 -ssd 80gb intel use 3ds max 2012 x64 shaded : 6 fps realistic : 4.2 fps shaded + Wireframe : 3 fps Wireframe : 3.4 fps everyone with high end graphic card help please , to make good reference , thanks , (excuse me for my english) Edited April 27, 2012 by kianoosh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kianoosh Posted April 28, 2012 Author Share Posted April 28, 2012 no one live in this forum ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diosdadobatac1 Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 Hi, I will try to install 3Dsmax2012 and do some viewport benchmark for you since we are almost having the same system. Only I'm not sure if you have moded your VGA to a quadro driver but if not, I dont think you should expect high framerates from this card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kianoosh Posted April 29, 2012 Author Share Posted April 29, 2012 (edited) Hi, I will try to install 3Dsmax2012 and do some viewport benchmark for you since we are almost having the same system. Only I'm not sure if you have moded your VGA to a quadro driver but if not, I dont think you should expect high framerates from this card. no , i dont use quadro deriver , i want see quadro 5000 and 6000 , ati firepro v7900 or v8800 performance on this scene to choice one of them , we tested it by gtx 580 have not different with my 9600gt !! Edited April 29, 2012 by kianoosh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markpeterson Posted May 3, 2012 Share Posted May 3, 2012 My Work PC : -Computer: Lenovo D20 -cpu: 2 x Xeon E5620 2.4GHz, Hyperthreaded 16 Cores -Video Card: FirePro V7800 1gb, running 3 x 24" monitors -ram: 6 x 4GB, 12GB per processor, 24GB total -mb: whatever came with the computer -hd: 500gb seagate barracuda (trying to convince IT for a SSD soon) First off I have been having computer problems lately, I actually ended up here looking for answers about why my computer acts so slow in 3ds sometimes. I actually have an open ticket with ATI right now about the video driver for 3ds max design 2013. Wireframe does not always display properly with my V7800. I also got an error opening your file FYI, Missing Dll vrender2012.dr Class V-Ray Adv 2.20.03. use 3ds max design 2012 x64 (from the autodesk infrastructure suite, no vray) shaded : 1.9 fps realistic : 0.86 fps Wireframe : 1.9 fps use 3ds max design 2013 x64 (from the autodesk infrastructure suite, no vray) shaded : 3.5 fps realistic : 2.7 fps Wireframe : 1.5 fps While running this on my desktop I saw all cores fluctuating(nothing consistant or over 30%), and the gpu at 0%. Its like the computer isnt even trying, yet it is still very choppy. Personal Laptop: -Computer: HP 8530w Elitebook -cpu: Intel Centrino 2 T9400, 2.53GHz, dual core -Video Card: Nvidia Quadro FX 770m, 512mb -ram: 2 x 4GB, 8GB total -mb: whatever came with the computer -ssd: Intel X-25m 160GB 3ds max design 2012 x64 (student edition, no vray) shaded : 2.2 fps realistic : 1.1 fps Wireframe : 2.1 fps While running this on my laptop I saw 1 core at 100%, the other at ~40%, and the gpu at ~40%. Hope it helps.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kianoosh Posted May 3, 2012 Author Share Posted May 3, 2012 My Work PC : -Computer: Lenovo D20 -cpu: 2 x Xeon E5620 2.4GHz, Hyperthreaded 16 Cores -Video Card: FirePro V7800 1gb, running 3 x 24" monitors -ram: 6 x 4GB, 12GB per processor, 24GB total -mb: whatever came with the computer -hd: 500gb seagate barracuda (trying to convince IT for a SSD soon) First off I have been having computer problems lately, I actually ended up here looking for answers about why my computer acts so slow in 3ds sometimes. I actually have an open ticket with ATI right now about the video driver for 3ds max design 2013. Wireframe does not always display properly with my V7800. I also got an error opening your file FYI, Missing Dll vrender2012.dr Class V-Ray Adv 2.20.03. use 3ds max design 2012 x64 (from the autodesk infrastructure suite, no vray) shaded : 1.9 fps realistic : 0.86 fps Wireframe : 1.9 fps use 3ds max design 2013 x64 (from the autodesk infrastructure suite, no vray) shaded : 3.5 fps realistic : 2.7 fps Wireframe : 1.5 fps While running this on my desktop I saw all cores fluctuating(nothing consistant or over 30%), and the gpu at 0%. Its like the computer isnt even trying, yet it is still very choppy. Personal Laptop: -Computer: HP 8530w Elitebook -cpu: Intel Centrino 2 T9400, 2.53GHz, dual core -Video Card: Nvidia Quadro FX 770m, 512mb -ram: 2 x 4GB, 8GB total -mb: whatever came with the computer -ssd: Intel X-25m 160GB 3ds max design 2012 x64 (student edition, no vray) shaded : 2.2 fps realistic : 1.1 fps Wireframe : 2.1 fps While running this on my laptop I saw 1 core at 100%, the other at ~40%, and the gpu at ~40%. Hope it helps.. of course , thanks a lot my friend , but i confused with those results !! in everywhere written ati firepro and quadro`s driver optimized for 3d application !! ? !! but in this benchmark my old gaming card was better than quadro fx4800 and v7800 and have no different with gtx 580 !! please read this : http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news/2011/7/6/review-specapc-for-3ds-max-2011-professional-benchmark.aspx?pageid=0 in this benchmark 3ds max 2011 scene have 32 million poly . any one can test my file with v7900 and quadro 6000 or 5000 ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sakiskalogirou Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 Here are my test results 3D max 2012 x64 shaded : 4.7 fps realistic : 4.1 fps shaded + Wireframe : 2.5 fps Wireframe : 2.6 fps ------------------------------- Hardware Used: Dual xeon E5520 CPU 12 Gb RAM Quadro 4000 GPU Crusial C300 256Gb SSD Tyan S7025 MOBO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diosdadobatac1 Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 3dSmax 2012 Shaded : 6.192 fps Realistic : 2.865 Shaded + wireframe : 3.9 fps Wireframe : 5.5 fps 3dSmax 2013 Shaded : 6.5 fps Realistic : 2.9 fps Shaded + wireframe : 2.9 fps Wireframe : 3.9 fps System: Core i72600k @ 4.6 GHz Asrock Z68 Extreme 4 Gen3 16Gb Corsair Vengeance @ 1600 MHz Nvidia Quadro FX 4600 1 TB Hardrive 7200 RPM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
branskyj Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 3DS Max 2012 Shaded: 3.466-3.514 FPS Realistic: 1.597-1.644 FPS Shaded + edged faces: 2.423- 2.468 FPS Wireframe: 3.909- 3.915 FPS System: Core i7 3930K GTX 460 2GB Palit 8GB Ram 7200 RPM HDD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diosdadobatac1 Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 3DS Max 2012 Shaded: 3.466-3.514 FPS Realistic: 1.597-1.644 FPS Shaded + edged faces: 2.423- 2.468 FPS Wireframe: 3.909- 3.915 FPS System: Core i7 3930K GTX 460 2GB Palit 8GB Ram 7200 RPM HDD Hi, Hope you dont mind me asking. You have a pretty great & pricey processor there, just curious with the other specs like the GPU. Are you using these for gaming? or for graphic works? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
branskyj Posted May 12, 2012 Share Posted May 12, 2012 Hi, the CPU is a beast, no doubt. I actually have 2 GTX 460s 2GB Palit. Gaming I do rarely, I mostly use the GPUs for GPU rendering with Octane. Cheers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diosdadobatac1 Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 Hi, I'm a bit intrigue with the result that you gave, It seems that you have a more powerful quadro 4000 compare to my old quadro fx4600 but the score doesn't seem to tell that. Maybe I did something wrong or its the other way around. I'm asking because I'm planning on buying a quadro fx4000 for my system. Thanks in advance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brodie Geers Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 Hi, I'm a bit intrigue with the result that you gave, It seems that you have a more powerful quadro 4000 compare to my old quadro fx4600 but the score doesn't seem to tell that. Maybe I did something wrong or its the other way around. I'm asking because I'm planning on buying a quadro fx4000 for my system. Thanks in advance This study is getting a bit old now but I think the overall point is still valid. http://www.cgarchitect.com/2010/07/cgarchitects-graphics-card-round-up It shows that there's not a 1:1 ratio of buying a good graphics card to getting good viewport performance. Often times cheaper cards perform better than expensive ones in some areas. Also, when more expensive cards do perform better it's often not by much for the money you spend. It makes buying a good card very difficult and benchmarking threads like this can be pretty valuable - although not ideal as there are more variables than just the graphics card affecting results. -Brodie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FilipZelenka Posted July 11, 2012 Share Posted July 11, 2012 3D max 2012 x64 - nitrous shaded : 4.8 fps realistic : 3.4 fps shaded + Wireframe : 2.5 fps Wireframe : 2.7 fps ------------------------------- Hardware Used: Dual xeon E5520 CPU 24 Gb RAM Quadro 3800 GPU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonathan Fantucchio Posted July 21, 2012 Share Posted July 21, 2012 (edited) Lenovo W520 Max 2013 Nitrous 16gig RAM I7 2720 2.2 Quadro 2000M 2gig Shaded 4.1 fps Realistic 3.2 fps Wireframe 2.0 fps Shaded Plus Edged Faces 1.4 fps Edited July 21, 2012 by Ico Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KuzysiekNowotka Posted September 22, 2012 Share Posted September 22, 2012 Hello, My specs: max design 2012 64bit (nitrous) Geforce GTX 570 1.2 GB i7 3770k@4.4GHz 16GB 1333mhz RAM I believe we should also add our display resolution. 1920x1200 And here are my scores: Shaded 6.1 fps Realistic 3.7 fps Wireframe 3.3 fps Shaded + Edged 2.9 fps On my laptop: Dell M6500 i7 940xm quadro fx 2800m res 1920x1200 Shaded 4.2 fps Realistic 2.2 fps Wireframe 4.0 fps Shaded + Edged 2.7 fps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stanleyscrave Posted September 25, 2012 Share Posted September 25, 2012 .. it's supposed to be like Nitrous used in racing as a power boost… well in the case of 3ds amx… NOT!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josef Wienerroither Posted September 25, 2012 Share Posted September 25, 2012 Are you guys all using the Max internal FPS counter and Stats display to measure VP performance ? IF yes - don't do so ... because * the Max internall FPS counter is lying, even more in Nitrous but still true in D3D * Stats display alone takes away viewport performance if any geometry stat is enabled that's because the geo stats display makes Max evaluate the modifier stack for geometry changes each frame, which slows down the whole viewport performance of course * you are propably testing with realtime playback enabled: in this state Max tries to trick you and skips frame if it thinks it's behind the schedule. So you have to DISABLE realtime playback in the time configuration dialog If you really want compareable and reproduceable results, i can post a benchmarking tool which i wrote back in 2008 to disprove the flawed viewport performance comparison ( between Maya, Max and XSI ) published by John Peddie Research's back than... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charlieinolas Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 I've browsed this thread and I don't really understand what's going on with these scores guys... The maximum result in shaded mode is let's say 6,5fps, and lowest here is 3,5 fps. So it's 3fps difference, what makes it no difference AT ALL. 6,5 is slow as hell so is 3,5.... So buy yourself a gaming GF for 150$ and Your viewport will work as fast as Quadro...But what are they for then ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brodie Geers Posted November 22, 2012 Share Posted November 22, 2012 I think the benchmark is just too intensive. A benchmark doesn't have to slow your computer to a crawl to work. The variance, as you point out is too small. Does a great graphics card provide a 3fps boost? Or is it a 200% boost? It's too difficult to tell with this benchmark. -Brodie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roest Posted November 27, 2012 Share Posted November 27, 2012 It would be very nice to have one or more benchmarks scenes to test our graphicards. I still think that spending 700€ on a V7900 was way to much for the performance i have.. It's probably very good with things i don't use... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charlieinolas Posted November 27, 2012 Share Posted November 27, 2012 check out this guys. The whole page is in russian however all what's needed is in the posted attachements. there is a comparison of results on different cards in the same scene. you may check the rendering time as well on different machines. might be helpful http://diasarnaat.blogspot.com/p/21.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charlieinolas Posted November 27, 2012 Share Posted November 27, 2012 (edited) post #70, there is a link to the scene, which measures and comparisons are in the previous link I gave You. http://3dcenter.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=111343&st=60 this is also a youtube film where is shown, how the 470 performs on this scene. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1VGZcBkXjw and to be honest it's nothing special as for this card. I'll also say, that me, on my crappy card (sapphire 4670 512mb) which is not worth probably more than 40$, I get 7-9 FPS in this scene on shaded + edges faces, and 13FPS on shaded mode (phenom 945 quad core, 8gb ram) Edited November 27, 2012 by charlieinolas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roest Posted November 27, 2012 Share Posted November 27, 2012 (edited) Thanks for the link! Unfortunately my card isn't on the list Thanks for other link also, will have a test after i finished my project. Edited November 27, 2012 by Roest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roest Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 (edited) Sorry for the late reply, Vacation Here are my test results (scene from page1): 3D max 2013 x64 (on Nitrous) shaded : 1.64 fps realistic : 0.711 fps shaded + Wireframe : 1.05 fps Wireframe : 1.9 fps on Direct 3D different viewports around 1.68 fps ------------------------------- The 10 000 000 poly scene (posted in the link above) Direct 3D: wireframe: 48 fps smooth: 34 fps smooth + highlights: 30,5 fps smooth + highlights + edged Faces : 17 fps ------------------------------- Hardware Used: i7 3930K CPU @ 3.20Ghz 24 Gb RAM V7900 GPU Crusial 256Gb SSD Asus P9x79 Edited January 4, 2013 by Roest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now