Krisztian Gulyas Posted August 8, 2012 Share Posted August 8, 2012 What do you think about a field of view of a 100 degree? Im making a small room but i have to show everything so would it be a good choice to use a 100 or 110 degree FOV or can you tell another way how could i show everything on a single picture because this way it will look a bit strange in my opinion? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nic H Posted August 9, 2012 Share Posted August 9, 2012 if it looks weird then it is weird Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sketchrender Posted August 9, 2012 Share Posted August 9, 2012 Take the wall behind you out and pull back a little . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephen Thomas Posted August 9, 2012 Share Posted August 9, 2012 If you try to show everything in one view, it almost never results in a good image. That goes for interiors and exteriors. I'm guessing this came from the client wanting more for his money. Two images would be better, or maybe doing a 360° QTVR would be a good idea if the client needs to see everything? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krisztian Gulyas Posted August 9, 2012 Author Share Posted August 9, 2012 if it looks weird then it is weird It's not done yet, I just think it's going to look weird but i'm not sure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krisztian Gulyas Posted August 9, 2012 Author Share Posted August 9, 2012 Take the wall behind you out and pull back a little . but then the lighting is going to be different. I mean the light won't bounce back from that wall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corey Beaulieu Posted August 9, 2012 Share Posted August 9, 2012 A FOV of 100 is right around a 15mm lens. This lens is only a little smaller than what I would consider to be a very typical interior lens for Architecture (18 -20mm). I think the edges are going to look stretched, but otherwise it should look fairly standard. In my experience, clients love wide cameras and are rarely concerned with the edges being stretched a bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krisztian Gulyas Posted August 9, 2012 Author Share Posted August 9, 2012 If you try to show everything in one view, it almost never results in a good image. That goes for interiors and exteriors. I'm guessing this came from the client wanting more for his money. Two images would be better, or maybe doing a 360° QTVR would be a good idea if the client needs to see everything? Actually there are small details that must on the same image. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Schroeder Posted August 9, 2012 Share Posted August 9, 2012 but then the lighting is going to be different. I mean the light won't bounce back from that wall. Not if you hide the wall from the camera in the object properties. The wall is invisible to the camera but is still in your scene to bounce light around. This is a very common technique when dealing with small rooms. We can do things that in the real world you could never do without a sledgehammer and a small lawsuit. Using a super wide lens will tend to make things look goofy and out of scale. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krisztian Gulyas Posted August 9, 2012 Author Share Posted August 9, 2012 Oh, yes. That'll do the trick. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now