Jump to content

scaling roofing material?


philvanderloo
 Share

Recommended Posts

I imported this Revit structure and applied an edit poly modifier, then applied a roofing material to all the polygons using autodesk bitmap

Roofing_Shingles_Composition_Brown.png

No matter what I do, the roofing renders scaled way too large and I can't seem to change it.

It seems to be close to the right scale in the viewport but it renders large. When I try to scale the material in the material editor it just slides up and down or sideways. What am I missing?

Thank You

Roof_Scale.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watched that video before posting this Ismael. Problem is, that entire structure was created in 3ds Max. Mine was created in Revit and imported and behaves COMPLETELY differently.

First of all, I have to apply a edit poly modifier to enable me to select individual roof polygons like in this video. Then, when I apply a uvw map modifier, select a roof polygon, the polygon is solid red, Unlike in the video, and I get a different gizmo which doesn't allow me to do anything but move the entire roof.

In the video you attached, when a roof polygon is selected, it doesn't turn red and you can still see the roofing material as you manipulate it with the gizmo.

Not working like that for me.

Importing from Revit is a complex undertaking and I'm making very little progress figuring it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"First of all, I have to apply a edit poly modifier to enable me to select individual roof polygons like in this video. Then, when I apply a uvw map modifier, select a roof polygon, the polygon is solid red, Unlike in the video, and I get a different gizmo which doesn't allow me to do anything but move the entire roof."

PV

 

In the video they selected the polygons, applied UVW map and then scaled the Gizmo of the UVW map they just added. You applied the UVW map then went down to a sub-object level poly...

 

 

http://docs.autodesk.com/3DSMAX/16/ENU/3ds-Max-Help/index.html?url=files/GUID-78327298-4741-470C-848D-4C3618B18FCA.htm,topicNumber=d30e270641

http://www.kxcad.net/autodesk/Autodesk_VIZ_Tutorial/tut_applying_uniform_textures_to_complex_geometry.html

http://docs.autodesk.com/3DSMAX/12/ENU/3ds%20Max%202010%20Tutorials/files/WS1a9193826455f5ff-54f556ca1166ac9ee9e-3826.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ismael,

Maybe I'm missing something here but, until I added the edit poly modifier, I was unable to select individual sections of the roof like in the video. The roof was one entity, (editable mesh), and I could select all or nothing.

All I'm trying to do is figure out why my roof material scale looks right in the viewport but still renders huge.

I've tried everything I could think of 10 times over and no matter what I do the scale of the shingles renders the same size. Changed the scale in the material editor and the modifier panel, (among many other things), and nothing has any effect.

Roof_Scale2.jpg

Edited by philvanderloo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Phil, it might sound crazy, and you don't need anymore crazy right now, but just faintly it looks to me like the tiles scale is correct, but the bitmap you are using has some "darkening" around the edges and this is causing the problem; you are not seeing a huge tile, but one "tiling" item of your bitmap (was that clear?).

I suggest you set your scale correctly again, but try another bitmap and make sure it "tiles" seamlessly in Photoshop. Also, put a bump mat in your material to see if you start getting some better look.

 

If I'm crazy, just ignore me, he he he. . .!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

There are some very good, realistic looking roofing materials available for scale model structures, but once in a while a project comes along that just cries out for something special. Creating your own realistic looking shakes is not as difficult as you might think, and the results are worth the effort.

"Barn Shakes" were a little thicker, and sometimes wavier version of hand-split shakes, and were often a bit longer - 24" as opposed to 18", so you could get a little more coverage per square.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...