unrinoceronte Posted September 26, 2013 Share Posted September 26, 2013 (edited) Hi, does anyone know which are the Standard Output DIMENSIONS or SIZE to deliver the most frequent type of Renderings to the client? Myself i work like this: Exterior Images: 3,500 pixels wide Interior Images: 2,500 pixels wide Billboard Images: 10,000 pixels wide (This has an extra charge for the job) Most of the time i deliver the final images in a .JPG format to the client. Less often i deliver as .TIFF is they need an alpha channel... Edited September 27, 2013 by unrinoceronte Spell check Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unrinoceronte Posted September 27, 2013 Author Share Posted September 27, 2013 Additionally, do you think 10,000 pixels wide is a good Standard for Billboard size output? Or should i make them bigger? (Bigger means more rendering time and sometimes more trouble with PCs handling the rendering job...which requires more time from me and affects the costs for me also...) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris MacDonald Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 There simply is no "standard" dimensions. Every project is different, and depends entirely on how the image is going to be used... For example you may have an A4 print at 600DPI, or you may be required to produce an 800x600 image for a website. It's all down to what the client wants. As for your billboard size, again it firstly depends on the size of the billboard and secondly on the DPI that they want it at - generally you don't need a 300 DPI, 3 meter wide billboard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nic H Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 why would an external image be bigger than an internal? industry standard is 5k which is also about 300dpi when printed a3 of course it also all depends on how high res your textures and post work are iv seen people rendering out 15k with blurry textures and trying to tell me its high resolution - yep high resolution mush mate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notamondayfan Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 Yup 5k here too, but as mentioned it depends on the project to an extent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazy Homeless Guy Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 5k. I prefer a 3:2 aspect ratio as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyderSK Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 95perc. of my clients do not print their works, so any DPI(PPI..but,yes) isn't important for them. I use 4K in most literate form 3840px in width, to accomodate nice scaling down (50perc. downsampling does bring out nicer detail than random scaling) to current web formats, FullHD/HD. It's also gonna look glorious on upcoming 4K displays, I am eying myself the Asus one after Christmass. With perfect AA, anything higher that this is mostly meaningless, as the detail provided by render is already almost twice as sharp as best DSLR. Though it's cool to zoom-in and check out the detail, it's just mostly for fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now