Jump to content

Is it Legal to use 3D Cars in Commercial Renderings?


braddewald
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'm doing a rendering for a client of a garage that will appear in a print and web ad and they're requesting using a specific car (BMW for example) off to the side in the rendering. Most 3d models of cars on Turbosquid come with an Editorial Use only clause. Does that mean it's not legal to use a 3D model of a branded car? Would it not be legal to park an actual BMW in an ad for a real life photoshoot?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's hard to say. I think back to video games that have pretty much the exact same gun model as say a Colt 1911, but it's named differently. Keep in mind, if you bought this from Evermotion or other dealer, they may have the license for BMW and that probably transfer's down to you the user. Or at least in my crackpot legal theory.

 

I think Mark's advice is solid. If in super doubt, contact BMW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am quite sure that using it outside of focal point of image (which is to show the garage) is the very definition of 'fair-use' in US for now with cars. It's only a prop that you're using like a public object (you didn't take any private object, like taking photo of painting in gallery and re-producing that).

You do answer yourself in the last sentence, it's only prop, but it's still better to modify the branding and make it literally object only.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would this same understanding apply to pictures of book covers to use as textures for props? Is this perhaps an issue similar to the golden age of napster before people realized it was against the law? The difference being the scale and relative obscurity of this industry. Has anyone gotten legal consultation on the subject? This has been nagging me for a couple months now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as I understand an editorial clause means you can't use a rendering of the car one something you plan to resell. For example, you couldn't render the car, then put it on a T-shirt to then sell the T-shirt.

 

If it's being used as a prop, then it's no different from photograhpy IMO. If you're really unsure contract Turbosquid, their live chat is really good.

 

Dean

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What happens if you take a photo of a house with a BMW out front? Are you supposed to Photoshop the logo out? I doubt BMW is suing rendering artists. They have much bigger fish to fry.

 

I just think about TV shows, like Mythbusters, where they put the black pieces of tape over the logos of the cars they drive. They have to cover the logo for a reason.

 

A big reason might be is that in that photo or TV spot, you don't want to give the impression that the car manufacturer supports or sponsors, without their written permission, what you are showing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I spoke with the client and they agreed to remove all the logos and any other brand-identifying markings from the car to be on the safe side. Hopefully that will be good enough. I find it funny that all those cars on sale at Turbosquid have "Editorial Use Only" licenses and they give news stories as an example - they have to know that people aren't using their products for news stories.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just think about TV shows, like Mythbusters, where they put the black pieces of tape over the logos of the cars they drive. They have to cover the logo for a reason.

 

A big reason might be is that in that photo or TV spot, you don't want to give the impression that the car manufacturer supports or sponsors, without their written permission, what you are showing.

 

Sometimes you'll see TV channels do this so they don't promote the brand, rather than fear of being sued. I think Channel 4 (UK) has a policy like this, and they don't show branding on any shows.

 

I really don't think car manufacturers could / would sue anyone for using their cars. Have you ever seen Top Gear (UK) where they test a car and completely slate it? Now if the car manufacturers really had that sort of control, don't you think their first complaint would be against car review programs?

 

Also look at cop shows, where the bad guys use a car for a bank-job, do car manufacturers stop the use of their cars as it could be seen as an ideal get-away car?!

 

Putting a car on a render isn't really something to worry about at all!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't think car manufacturers could / would sue anyone for using their cars....

 

Also look at cop shows, where the bad guys use a car for a bank-job, do car manufacturers stop the use of their cars as it could be seen as an ideal get-away car?!

 

It's called Product Displacement and in the Wikipedia entry they actually cite an example of something very similar to what you are talking about:

 

According to Danny Boyle, director of 2008 film Slumdog Millionaire, the makers had to resort to "product displacement" when companies such as Mercedes refused to allow their products to be used in non-flattering settings. While they didn't mind having a gangster driving their cars, they objected to their products been shown in a slum setting. This forced the makers in post-production to remove logos digitally, costing "tens of thousands of pounds".

 

As for it not being something to worry about, I'm definitely known for being too worried about things but the Turbosquid license agreement was very explicit in stating it is only for use in news stories (which I still find extremely odd) so that threw up a red flag.

Edited by braddewald
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...