Danny Posted November 4, 2004 Share Posted November 4, 2004 at first i wanted to send this view to my client as a final one but i found that it's like something not right but i cannot what is the wrong of it..pls help me to make it more impresive c&c ar welcome any comment i will read tomorrow, i'm going out now. thanks in advance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Nelson Posted November 4, 2004 Share Posted November 4, 2004 I think you should get rid of the center palm tree altogether. And the car on the right takes too much attention...maybe move it a little more to the right. Also that car is much brighter than the one of the left so maybe you could match their levels a little better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kulbir bal Posted November 4, 2004 Share Posted November 4, 2004 i am agree with timmatron and one more thing i would like to add is that reduce the size of plant pots beside the road, it is not propotional Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazy Homeless Guy Posted November 4, 2004 Share Posted November 4, 2004 i agree that you need to do something about the palm trees. maybe leave the middle one, but shrink the size some, make it fully visible, and move it closer to the one on the left so they are not so symmetrical. also, the palm need more contrast. i think you need to move your camera position down some also. i really appreciate that you are trying to avoid parallax, but go ahead and move it down, then crop the bottom off. the reason i say this is because you are using photoshop to composut the planters and people into the image. the photos that you are compositing with were shot around eye level. i can not tell exactly, but i think the camera is really about 8-9 feet off of the ground, rather than 5.5-6 feet off of the ground. the shadow on the ground on the right of the image. where is it coming from? the sun is slightly to the left when facing the building, but the tree shadow looks like it is being cast i the sun was from the right. i agree with losing the car on the left. it is distracting, and it looks like you have a really nice composit with the background, which you are just covering up. if you lose it, you may want to crop about a 1/4" of an inch or so off of that side to rebalance the image. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockley91 Posted November 4, 2004 Share Posted November 4, 2004 I was first drawn to the building. It was such a great job I couldn't find anything wrong with it. I then started to look at the composition. I agree with all the other comments.... I think the center tree should come out. The left palm tree looks alright, but I would move the right palm tree further to the right, so it kind of frames the building between the trees and balances the composition. In addition to that I would then take out the car on the right. It is pretty out of scale and pretty bright. The car on the left is fine in my opinion. The only other thing I can think of is maybe increase the source light a bit. Add a little more contrast to the building might add some punch. Oh...and the curb control joints look to thick. Maybe a bit thinner. Good job though! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJL Imaging Posted November 4, 2004 Share Posted November 4, 2004 I too like the modeling of the building, however, the shadow's don't seem to be doing the same thing from Building to the people and trees. I could be wrong but the shadows created by the people and trees are coming from behind the camera, and the shadows on the building are coming from left of the camera. I also agree with not "ghosting" the tree, either modify it's location and size, or get rid of it. the car at the right too,....move it or lose it. you're doing a great job on this one otherwise. Keep it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny Posted November 5, 2004 Author Share Posted November 5, 2004 thanks for everyone for your opinion. this image i just edit on photoshop and some of your comment i haven't comply yet, i'm so sorry but i will change that soon specially on camera height and the car on the left. thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ipdesigner Posted November 5, 2004 Share Posted November 5, 2004 *now its better..but what happened to your roof? its a a little bit saturated, the roof on the first image i think looks better.. *you did perfect now on the foreground.. ***ill just want to ask this even its late....coz what i meant about bungalow type house is just a 'one-storey structure'....correct me if im wrong.. *keep posting!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny Posted November 10, 2004 Author Share Posted November 10, 2004 this my final rendering any critiques are welcome. thank for all of your comment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STRAT Posted November 10, 2004 Share Posted November 10, 2004 nice. but a bungalow is a small single story house or cottage type of thing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny Posted November 10, 2004 Author Share Posted November 10, 2004 It a 2 1/2 budget storey Bungalow maybe.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricardo Eloy Posted November 10, 2004 Share Posted November 10, 2004 Oh, c'mon! The guy's got a big family! For them, THAT's just a bungalow.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ipdesigner Posted November 10, 2004 Share Posted November 10, 2004 Oh, c'mon! The guy's got a big family! For them, THAT's just a bungalow.... *yeah!!! maybe!!, cnt imagine whats gonna be in our country.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kicks Posted November 10, 2004 Share Posted November 10, 2004 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockley91 Posted November 11, 2004 Share Posted November 11, 2004 You'd be surprised at the "bungalows" here in Alamo Heights in San Antonio, Texas... I work in Alamo Heights and the bungalow style is pretty common here. They date back to the 1920's and 30's.... Well, the city council likes to keep that style in the neighborhood and I've been to a few city council meetings for approval of new homes that are being built. I would show them a 3D animation of the home from aerial and eye level views. Very basic mass models, but it would show the style. These new homes are huge! Some of them are 3 stories! Yet, they try to capture that "bungalow" style. I think they work great, but I do believe "bungalow" is pushing it. Some of the neighbors would get up during the "approval" meetings and give their say that these new homes are not "bungalow".....it's pretty hilarious when these neighbors get all bent out of shape and they all start to argue with each other during a city council meeting.....I mean they really get into it, almost a fist fight with people that are for the builder vs. people that are against the builder....and then you have the mayor trying to calm everyone down......very enlightening Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockley91 Posted November 11, 2004 Share Posted November 11, 2004 I've had a discussion with my boss as to the "bungalow" style and that is exactly what it is, a style. They bungalow "style" is not based on the size but rather the design elements that are incorporated into it. A "colonial" house, or a "cape cod" house, or a "ranch" house are not based on size, but the style... "Judge me by my size do you?" Yoda-Empire Strikes Back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now