edwinbarker Posted March 27, 2016 Share Posted March 27, 2016 Scenario: Architect/Designer submits building/remodeling plans to city building department, which are then approved and a permit issued. Only one problem: CC&RS on the lot prohibit the construction as already approved and permitted by the city. Who is to blame? The architect for not checking for CCRS before preparing the plans or the city for approving plans, and accepting money for plan check, reviews and permit for plans that would be illegal if constructed upon? Sure, the architect goofed, but does the city have any responsibility? Please let me know your thoughts! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Dollus Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 The city does not check for CC&R's. It's unrealistic to expect them to be familiar with every single development entity within a jurisdiction. It is the responsibility of the architect of record. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roseangel Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 (edited) To become familiar with the terms and conditions you must abide by as the owner of property in a development, you should request copies of all its governing documents Gorilla Online Marketing Edited April 29, 2016 by roseangel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monatank Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 Yes, definitely it’s architectures responsibility to check CC&R’s. Practically city don’t responsible for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now