Jeff Mottle Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 I've already downloaded mine! http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4051553.stm http://makelovenotspam.com/intl/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ernest Burden III Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 I've already downloaded mine! Having been IDed as a spammer by the blacklisting sites due to address spoofing, i certainly HOPE that the target sites for these Robin Hood 'denial-of-service' styled attacks are well screened. I have three sites and like most of us, am on the hook for bandwidth charges. I'm pretty sure I had to tag cgarchitect.com as 'friend' to the SPAM filters to keep it from getting flagged. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Mottle Posted November 29, 2004 Author Share Posted November 29, 2004 Having been IDed as a spammer by the blacklisting sites due to address spoofing, i certainly HOPE that the target sites for these Robin Hood 'denial-of-service' styled attacks are well screened. I have three sites and like most of us, am on the hook for bandwidth charges. I'm pretty sure I had to tag cgarchitect.com as 'friend' to the SPAM filters to keep it from getting flagged. Yeah them mention on the screensaver DL site how they use spamcop filters initally and then use people to manually verify them before they add the to their DoD attack. CGA newsletters would show up as spam on almost all filters becuase of the nature of how they are sent out. However I don't send to 8 million people and all the people on our newsletters are double opt-in. I think everyone would have to report CGA to Spamcop or similar to be targetted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ernest Burden III Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 And this is exactly what I wanted to do to 'junk fax'ers' by using an internet dialer to repeatedly call their toll-free numbers (it's not toll-free to THEM), I just never found out how to set up the dialer. Same concept, though. Overall, its a wonderful idea, because at some point a spammer or telemarketer or junk fax'er must have a way to generate cash. There more we can raise the costs to them of generating that cash (our cash) the less they can operate. They aren't doing it to be pests, that's just a side-effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ernest Burden III Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 Yeah them mention on the screensaver DL site how they use spamcop filters initally and then use people to manually verify them before they add the to their DoD attack. My point, exactly. CGA is NOT spamming, I requested it. Yet it still get IDed as a spam sourse, as does my domain. Maybe if this initiative takes off it will force sites like SpamCop to do a better job of IDing spammers, or else face lawsuits from people wrongly tagged and them hit with thousands of dollars of bandwidth charges. The potential damage is quite high, so this raises the stakes for the filters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Mottle Posted December 14, 2004 Author Share Posted December 14, 2004 How dissapointing that the screensaver was discontinued becuase someone released a trojan using the same name as the screen saver that Lycos release. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now