Stephan Dupont Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 Hello, I have a question about the animation. I want to make a linear movement of camera in my scene. I set everything as I wanted. To prevent the camera from moving too fast, I set the duration of the animation to 200 frames (8 seconds). Which means that I have to make 200 renderings, which will take me an incalculable time! Do you have any tips to limit the number of renderings needed for an animation from 8s to 25 frames per second? Thx a lot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Vella Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 You could use a render farm. I wouldn't recommend using less than 25 frames per second. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephan Dupont Posted March 14, 2018 Author Share Posted March 14, 2018 Thx James but I don't want to pay for a render farm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Vella Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 Well in that case you could - optimise the scene/render settings to render faster - lower the resolution - render passes and comp the crap out of it - ask a friend to use their hardware - since the camera is linear you could render one large image and pan across the image in comp - upgrade your hardware Or calculate how long it would take at the quality you require and wait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larissa Holderness Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 As James said - render out a large image and pan. It is the easiest and fastest. You cannot have quality, quantity, and cost/time - it just doesn't happen that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dombrowski Posted March 15, 2018 Share Posted March 15, 2018 Rendering one large still and doing the "Ken Burns effect" pan is likely the fastest option. The trade-off is that you will lose the effect of the camera moving through the 3D space. Keep in mind that HD video has a resolution of 1920x1080, which is likely lower than that of whatever stills you are producing. Optimizing the scene, hiding everything not visible to the camera (watch for things that should be visible in reflections, even if not directly visible to the camera), and lowering the resolution to HD may get you closer to acceptable render times. But yeah, animations take a while to render. What render engine are you using? With Corona, you can cut corners by increasing the noise limit a bit and using their denoising filter. It might not be a tack-sharp animation, but it'll be a finished animation which is better than nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now