kinkabobba Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 Hello all! I'm trying to bring Revit models into Unity by way of 3ds Max, and the biggest issue I've encountered so far is how incredibly heavy Revit models are-- not good for an interactive environment. I had a breakthrough when I realized that families come into 3ds Max as separate objects and not instances of one object. Therefore, I'm trying to find a good instance replacer for 3ds max, and thought for a minute it would be this: http://www.scriptspot.com/3ds-max/scripts/instance-identical-geometry?page=1 However, version 2 doesn't work, and version 1 doesn't seem to agree with Revit geometry. There are objects that are clearly exactly the same that it doesn't recognize as such, and there are objects that it recognizes correctly as being the same, but using the replace feature throws the geometry all over the model. Any help is much appreciated! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris MacDonald Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 Any workflow that is that convoluted is going to suffer from some issues. Revit to 3DS Max doesn't even work, let alone then taking it forwards into another bit of software. Model it in max. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kinkabobba Posted September 11, 2014 Author Share Posted September 11, 2014 Unfortunately that's not really an option-- I'm working with architects that want a highly accurate and detailed representation of their design (hence their Revit model). That's what they want to see-- not my approximation of it remodeled. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harryhirsch Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 ''not my approximation of it remodeled.'' Why approximation? 3Dmax is accurate enough. It is accurate to the Millimeter. Take the measurements from the Revit file and remodel it. Did the architects tell you to use the Revit file or do u assume that there is no other way? I am an architect and a 1:1 copy would be accurate enough for me....And architects know that Renderings are not construction drawings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Schroeder Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 You can use the Revit model as a base guide and create clean geometry in Max. If your max geometry matches perfectly in-line with the dumpy Revit geometry, how can that not be accurate? Instancer scripts dont' like Revit geometry because of how awful that geometry is. Even the same object sometimes will not have the same vertex order, which is important for instances. If you want to go to Unity and if you don't want to deal with the heavy Revit geometry, you must re-model it in max. That's the only option. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kinkabobba Posted September 11, 2014 Author Share Posted September 11, 2014 Thanks for the responses. I should have made something clear in my initial question: the primary reason for sticking with the Revit geometry is that this is an evolving model (only in SD phase right now) and the idea is to be able to provide them with an updated 'video game' version of their model quickly whenever they send me their updated Revit file all through CDs. If I maintain a Revit to 3ds Max link, then these updates will occur automatically. If I manually remodel their Revit model, each time they send me a new one I'll have to go through it and figure out what has changed and manually remodel the new elements myself. This is what I meant by staying accurate-- there's no room for human error if I simply use their geometry. Furthermore, the turnaround time is too quick for this kind of workflow. So I understand that Revit geometry will always be dumpy, but I'm curious if anyone has any tips on making it less dumpy. So far all I've been able to do is: 1) Figure out what should be instanced and make those changes (I think I'm able to do this and still maintain the link to the Revit file) 2) Use the pro-optimizer modifier Thanks for your help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris MacDonald Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 I can see your point, we often have wank Revit models that people want to squeeze every last bit of life out of before realising it does actually need to be properly remodelled. I honestly can't help you. I think the best bet is to educate these people on how the software works (or doesn't) and hope that they don't make such ludicrous requests in future. It's the workflow that I've adapted and it's taken a couple of years for it to finally begin to sink in that you can't get everything from a Revit model. I realise this isn't helpful. Best of luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now